Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump, GOP set to battle on spending cuts
The Hill ^ | January 23rd, 2017 | By Alexander Bolton

Posted on 01/23/2017 7:27:15 AM PST by Mariner

Donald Trump may be headed into a big fight with Republican lawmakers with his plans for dramatic cuts to federal spending.

Trump transition officials are combing through conservative budgets to find ways to save money in an effort to get rid of the “tremendous waste, fraud and abuse” that Trump pledged to eliminate during the campaign.

Many of the proposals that Trump’s team are reviewing would gain support from a majority of conservative House Republicans, who have sought to cut the federal deficit by scrapping government programs they view as unnecessary.

But some of Trump’s targets have fans in the GOP-controlled Congress, particularly in the Senate.

Trump's team is working with the Office of Management and Budget to lay the groundwork for the new administration’s initial budget proposal, which is expected to reach Congress in the next 45 days.

In their search for savings, Team Trump is relying on proposals outlined last year by the Heritage Foundation in its “Blueprint for Balance: a federal budget for 2017.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 115th; federalspending; first100days; trump45
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Hypocrites.
1 posted on 01/23/2017 7:27:15 AM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Put the old-GOP Congress people in the position of having to defend higher spending in opposition to Trump wanting to cut it. A midterm election is coming up in 2 years, we’ll see who wins.


2 posted on 01/23/2017 7:29:28 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The very reason we have PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!! The GOPe will get there asses handed to them!


3 posted on 01/23/2017 7:30:37 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
But some of Trump’s targets have fans in the GOP-controlled Congress, particularly in the Senate.

Almost every spending program had some republican support but it is time for republicans to stop governing like democrats.


4 posted on 01/23/2017 7:33:51 AM PST by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

View from heavily fed job dependent Virginia...
Not so important to Senators. Our Dem Senators will be hurt by the cuts.
Maybe cost us one NOVA/near NOVA representative.
Locally, could have some small impact.
All-in-all a good thing for the Party here.

Should be done immediately so other events will soften the impact before next elections.


5 posted on 01/23/2017 7:34:46 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

6 posted on 01/23/2017 7:35:29 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I don’t think there will be as much problem as people think. If rino ryan and turkey neck McConnell, don’t come up with a real cuts, Trump can do it on his own without a budget and with continuing resolutions. Trump would have to prioritize during this process, so this would be his chance to cut and gut on his own. Quite a few in congress want the infrastructure programs and defense spending and this won’t happen without a budget.


7 posted on 01/23/2017 7:35:39 AM PST by grumpygresh (When will Soros be brought to justice? Crush the vermin, crush the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Cut Congressional budget/staff 20%


8 posted on 01/23/2017 7:42:27 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

But some of Trump’s targets have fans in the GOP-controlled Congress, particularly in the Senate.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That’s because there are far too many Democrats in R jerseys in the Senate.

In 2018, Corker, Hatch, Heller and Flake need to be replaced.
They betrayed the citizen with their vote for Gang of Eight.


9 posted on 01/23/2017 7:44:14 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
it is time for republicans to stop governing like democrats.

With $20 trillion in debt, we simply can't afford it.


10 posted on 01/23/2017 8:11:45 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
But some of Trump’s targets have fans in the GOP-controlled Congress, particularly in the Senate.

Yep. That, in a nutshell, is everything that is wrong with the Republican Party. Republicans talk on and on and on about limited government and cutting spending and resisting government intruding on our lives and then they do absolutely nothing about cutting the budget. Why? Because they don't want to. They like government. They like their pet programs. They don't think its a priority. It is why conservative voters have been so frustrated for the past 8 years. Hell, its why we have been so disappointed for 16 years. George Bush was no better. He talked a good game but when it came to cutting spending, he was horrible. He set the stage for Obama's spending binge with his own spending binge. Cutting our current budget by 10% should be an absolute no-brainer. It should be easy given how much it has increased over the past 16 years.

11 posted on 01/23/2017 8:19:03 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Trump is in a great position to do away with this omnibus spending bill nonsense. He can request a military budget, an infrastructure budget, etc. Perhaps require no bill longer than 499 pages.


12 posted on 01/23/2017 8:34:45 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I was thinking about this situation last night.

Let’s say they pass a budget that includes a discretionary increase of 5% over last year.

Can’t Trump order the departments to spend 10% less than last year? I mean, is he obligated to spend the money is he?


13 posted on 01/23/2017 8:35:19 AM PST by laxcoach (Government is greedy. Taxpayers who want their own money are not greedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laxcoach

The Executive is NOT obligated or bound to spend as much as the Congress allocates.

Unless the budget law says funds “must” be expended on certain items, as is the case with entitlements.

Trump can have his cabinet cut 20% across the board in every discretionary dept. Though there are some personnel actions that require Congressional approval...like refusing to deal with Unions, benefits, mass layoffs etc.

But Trump can get around those by insisting on wording changes in any/every new budget and can win them easily in trade for something the Republican commies want.

Like airports in Alaska.


14 posted on 01/23/2017 9:03:48 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mariner; laxcoach
Impoundment
15 posted on 01/23/2017 9:11:17 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

No surprise; in fact, completely predictable.

For the most part, we’re dealing with Republicans, not conservatives.

They only act like they’re for smaller government when they know there’s no chance a vote for budget cutting will carry the day. If they can get away with a “show vote” for massive cuts that they know is predestined to go nowhere, they will be all over it.


16 posted on 01/23/2017 9:31:31 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

How I wish Dave Brat was Speaker of the House and Ted Cruz was Majority Leader of the Senate. With Ryan and McConnell in charge, any dramatic swing to a smaller government will mean fighting the Dims and then fighting the Repubs.


17 posted on 01/23/2017 9:33:23 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Trump will force the USSC to deal with Impoundment.

It is clearly within the Executive purview.


18 posted on 01/23/2017 11:04:43 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

SCOTUS has already dealt with impoundment in 1974, which from a legal point of view, is merely a line item veto.


19 posted on 01/23/2017 11:44:45 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

SCOTUS never heard the case.


20 posted on 01/23/2017 12:43:38 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson