Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

4th Circuit Rules Common Rifles not Protected by Second Amendment
ammoland ^ | 26 February, 2017 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 03/01/2017 5:04:58 AM PST by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Wolfie

No, it’s not. Just because some @zzhole judge says it is don’t make it so. That pesky Constitution lives yet.

Things will be dicey in the People’s Republic of Maryland, got it. They stop cars and yank people out of them while searching for guns. Especially out of state drivers.

But look at CT, NY, & MA. They have yet to send out the flying monkeys to seize ex post facto `illegal’ firearms. And Governor Moonbeam in CA is staring at insurrection if he does.


21 posted on 03/01/2017 6:52:09 AM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Oooh! Detachable magazine! Evil! /s

There’s a reason a certain author ;-) depicted _scopes_ as the definitive “evil feature” to ban. One round fired from an antique single-shot rifle *with quality optics* is the weapon most to be politically feared.


22 posted on 03/01/2017 6:59:15 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Rumors of the Constitution’s death are premature.


23 posted on 03/01/2017 7:21:10 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

“look at CT, NY, & MA. They have yet to send out the flying monkeys to seize ex post facto `illegal’ firearms.”

NY has made it a felony to do other than register or turn in “assault weapons”; no transfers of any kind allowed.
Immediately before the ban, there were about a half-million owners of such weapons - a group noted for being extremely law-abiding (as far as categories of residents go).
96% of owners have decided to be felons rather than comply.
And police have made it generally clear they do not intend to enforce the ban, for obvious reasons.


24 posted on 03/01/2017 7:26:30 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Oh, but listen to the weak sisters:

“They’ll just freeze your bank accounts!”
“They’ll seize your children!”
“They’ll stop you for a burned out taillight!”
“They’ll pressure your boss to fire you!”

But...wait just a second - Obama’s not in office anymore. Andrew Cuomo & Jerry Brown are on their own.


25 posted on 03/01/2017 7:45:30 AM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...

RKBA Ping List

This list is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.

If you would like to be added to or deleted from this Ping List, please FReepmail me.

26 posted on 03/01/2017 8:19:24 AM PST by PROCON (Defending the Border isn't a Political Option, it's a Constitutional Obligation ~ Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Great graphic, love that.

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

27 posted on 03/01/2017 8:24:12 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Once we get nine SCOTUS’s this sh!t will disappear!!


28 posted on 03/01/2017 8:38:48 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It should be illegal for printers to print out more than 3 sheets of newsprint a minute. Internet activity has sparked global warming and electricity useage must drop, and paper useage has killed our old growth forests.

In response to this, newspaper printing and internet dispersion of anyones opinion on anything will be made punishable as a justified court should so deem.

This will not hamper anyone’s 1st amendment rights as they can still speak their mind whenever it does’t interfere with anyone elses rights to not hear their crap.


29 posted on 03/01/2017 8:39:59 AM PST by Delta 21 (The minority demands NOTHING !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The 4th Circuit ignored the parts of the Heller decision it did not like, and completely ignored the Caetano decision.

Completely ignored U.S. v. Miller as well.

30 posted on 03/01/2017 9:10:51 AM PST by zeugma (The Brownshirts have taken over American Universities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Here we go again.


31 posted on 03/01/2017 9:27:05 AM PST by DungeonMaster (Love your neighbor as you love yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Legislation liars from the socialist liberal agenda bench ..... nothing new, will happen time and time again. We have to teach our children as they will have to pick up the fight when we’re gone..... vote with your dollars and try and starve the beast .


32 posted on 03/01/2017 9:52:54 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

On a related note, ...

Not very long ago, it struck me that the Second Amendment might be interpreted to say, “Given that the government will have a great army, the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms (in order to guard against government tyranny) shall not be infringed.”


33 posted on 03/01/2017 11:29:06 AM PST by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Not very long ago, it struck me that the Second Amendment might be interpreted to say, “Given that the government will have a great army, the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms (in order to guard against government tyranny) shall not be infringed.”

It would be nice if it was phrased like that if that was the intent.

34 posted on 03/01/2017 12:06:26 PM PST by DungeonMaster (Love your neighbor as you love yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Sounds like the 4th Circuit needs a visit from the second amendment.


35 posted on 03/01/2017 12:32:13 PM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

A few of us have concluded that. My variant (commandeering a common argument to reach the same Molon Labe end):
“A standing army being a necessary evil to ensure the security of a free country, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall nonetheless not be infringed.”

Point being that the Founding Fathers deeply disliked “standing armies”, but grudgingly recognized it would be necessary because a militia of the people (however well equipped & trained) would, while preferable, realistically be insufficiently reliable. This destroys the common notion “we have a military, so it makes sense to disarm the people.”


36 posted on 03/01/2017 12:53:53 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
It would be nice if it was phrased like that if that was the intent.

Actually, it makes perfect sense phrased as it is.

And I'd be willing to bet the intended meaning would have been crystal clear to anyone with a fifth-grade education in 1789.

It's only later that the tyrants and their sheeple allowed it to go fuzzy.

37 posted on 03/01/2017 1:25:21 PM PST by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

As Trump would say, “Wrong.”

This is going to SCOTUS. But not before Gorsuch is confirmed.


38 posted on 03/01/2017 2:34:12 PM PST by proud American in Canada (May God Bless the U.S.A. (Trump: I will bear these slings and arrows for you, the American people)o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson