Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How low has President Obama gone to tap my phones during the very sacred election process.
Trump/Twitter ^

Posted on 03/04/2017 4:07:47 AM PST by navysealdad

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: DJ Frisat

Correct. Fisa approved one in oct for computer server.


21 posted on 03/04/2017 6:13:14 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat

According to Levin, Andrew McCarthy provided the following details. The original June FISA request mentioned Tromp, by name. But the standard for requests is ‘probable cause’ that a named individual be an agent of a foreign power in order to obtain a wiretap. That did not fly.

In October, a narrowed request was made, omitting Trump’s name, but including those of Paul Manafort, Roger Stone and somebody named Page(?) This request was apparently approved.

I got this from Levin’s March 2nd Audio Rewind (podcast), starting at about 8 minutes in. I take no responsibility for the accuracy of the information, and won’t get into a pissing contest about Levin or anything else. Just reporting on what I heard, and where I heard it...


22 posted on 03/04/2017 6:17:29 AM PST by DJ Frisat (Hey, what happened to my clever tag line?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame

It is time for Chris Christie to be appointed Special Prosecutor to investigate “Obama-Gate” and Valerie Jarrett’s Iranian “connections”.


23 posted on 03/04/2017 6:19:59 AM PST by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad
Question:
Since Sessions had recused himself, does this mean he CANNOT investigate this incident because it happened during the campaign?
24 posted on 03/04/2017 6:22:39 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
"At the risk of getting all the Mark Levin haters foaming at the mouth, I believe that he explained on Thursday night’s program that a change was made to the original FISA request and a modified form was subsequently approved."

Levin probably helped revise the petition.

25 posted on 03/04/2017 6:23:38 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
"At the risk of getting all the Mark Levin haters foaming at the mouth, I believe that he explained on Thursday night’s program that a change was made to the original FISA request and a modified form was subsequently approved."

Levin probably helped revise the petition.

26 posted on 03/04/2017 6:23:40 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

I kept reading your comment on different threads and wondered why you continually posted it ;)


27 posted on 03/04/2017 7:08:38 AM PST by Principled (OMG I'm so tired of all this winning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

I second that motion!


28 posted on 03/04/2017 7:34:13 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Well you just got your attorney general to recuse himself from election fraud...........involving the Russians.

Nothing to stop Sessions in this case. Also, its likely to be investigated by the Feds in NY.


29 posted on 03/04/2017 8:02:15 AM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick; DJ Frisat

October one was for a bank server, not President Trump’s phones.

0 went way beyond what was approved.


30 posted on 03/04/2017 9:50:43 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo

And the feds in New York have Preet Bharara, a bulldog of an investigator...

And you are right, AG Sessions only backed out of investigating —Russian- involvement, —not— 0’s or anyone else’s.


31 posted on 03/04/2017 9:54:36 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

Everyone knows that if Barack Obama wanted to wiretap Trump or anyone else, he wouldn’t be constrained by the legal requirement to get a FISA warrant. He believes he is above the law.


32 posted on 03/05/2017 7:48:26 PM PST by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

Remember:

Obama wiretapped teh parents of Fox News’s James Rosen — no legal authority that I know of.

He illegally used the IRS to punish political opponents.

He illegally used an executive order to give amnesty to “Dreamers” — a power even he admitted he didn’t have.

He and Eric Holder intervened ion the ongoing case against the New Black panthers to end the prosecution — after the Bush Administration had essentially gotten them convicted.

So why wouldn’t hve wiretap Trump, with or without a warrant?


33 posted on 03/05/2017 7:51:41 PM PST by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson