Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IVANKA TRUMP Company Sued Over 'UNFAIR' KELLYANNE CONWAY PUBLICITY
tmz ^ | 3/20/17 | tmz

Posted on 03/20/2017 1:42:23 PM PDT by RummyChick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: lakecumberlandvet

[ Lawyers are Despicable. With a capital D.]

The only difference between a hooker and a lawyer is that the hooker stops screwing you when you are dead.


41 posted on 03/20/2017 2:28:16 PM PDT by Islander2 (Some of us are here because we are not all there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

A perfect example of Ayn Rand’s looters. Can’t compete on the marketplace? Seek rent!


42 posted on 03/20/2017 2:35:50 PM PDT by Seruzawa (I keel you Vorga feelthy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Let me see if I have this right. Company A that markets clothing is suing Company B that markets clothing over something someone else said? What did Ivanka Trump Marks, LLC do to incur legal liability?


43 posted on 03/20/2017 2:41:36 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Also, isn’t this an implicit admission that the Left’s attempt to boycott Ivanka Trump Marks, LLC has backfired? I mean, if the Left had succeeded in damaging Ivanka Trump Marks, LLC’s brand, then there would be no reason to sue. Right?


44 posted on 03/20/2017 2:48:20 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Attacking Kelly is just a diversion, if I am not mistaken a whole bunch of people dropped her clothing line generating all kind of liberal satisfaction and coverage. True Americans do not like it when someone is being bullied or ganged up on, glad her line is doing well


45 posted on 03/20/2017 2:53:22 PM PDT by wild74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Here is the lawsuit

I doubt it survives the California equivalent of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

46 posted on 03/20/2017 2:59:21 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Looks like the Left really decided to go on offense to start the week.
47 posted on 03/20/2017 3:00:09 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (It is time to make America an uncomfortable place for Marxist usurpers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37
we are sick to death of you leftist assholes, and f*** you very much.

Touche`

48 posted on 03/20/2017 3:00:30 PM PDT by Canedawg (from FUBO to MAGA! Thank the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Sounds like stuff you’d see in TJ Maxx, Steinmart, etc.


49 posted on 03/20/2017 3:08:30 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Modern Appealing Clothing (MAC) is a clothing retailer. They are not a competitor to Ivanka Trump Marks, LLC. In fact, MAC sells clothing from designers like Ivanka Trump Marks, LLC. If MAC has noticed the success of Ivanka Trump Marks, LLC, they should carry the “Ivanka Trump” line of clothing and participate in the success.


50 posted on 03/20/2017 3:33:59 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Kellyanne’s comments were really political. Made in response to a political attack on Ivanka. As soon as the dems made the attack political, all speech in response is political. Kellyanne’s goal was political not commercial.


51 posted on 03/20/2017 4:17:25 PM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolutionary

^

Excellent point, Revolutionary.


52 posted on 03/20/2017 6:07:17 PM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
..."exploiting the power and prestige of the White House"...

And before he even announced, she was "exploiting the power and prestige of" the Trump name to do business successfully. Should they have sued for that?

53 posted on 03/21/2017 9:50:57 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Never heard of any of them.


54 posted on 03/21/2017 9:54:22 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I hadn’t either. I wonder if they are suing Ivanka to try to generate their own publicity.


55 posted on 03/21/2017 1:12:26 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I hadn’t either. I wonder if they are suing Ivanka to try to generate their own publicity.


56 posted on 03/21/2017 1:12:26 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

* rolls eyes *


57 posted on 03/24/2017 5:32:56 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson