Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Dakota: The 2nd Amendment Is Your Concealed Carry Permit
breitbart.com ^ | 3/24/2017 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 03/24/2017 6:14:20 AM PDT by rktman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: All

Don’t agree with the title; am happy ND did this, anyway!
Carrying a concealed weapon of any kind has been unlawful for a very long time. Maybe from common law times?
If you wanted a weapon you carried it openly. Hiding it implied you may be planning to do something evil with it, like rob someone.


21 posted on 03/24/2017 8:29:40 AM PDT by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InABunkerUnderSF

Daylight Saving Time? Wow! You are in a very small minority that gets it right.


22 posted on 03/24/2017 10:19:38 AM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bert

Not Wyatt’s ordinance. That is his brother Virgil’s.


23 posted on 03/24/2017 10:32:26 AM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: veracious
If you wanted a weapon you carried it openly. Hiding it implied you may be planning to do something evil with it, like rob someone.

That sounds like lib-speak to me.

24 posted on 03/24/2017 1:45:16 PM PDT by TigersEye (We all have a stake in MAGA! We all need to contribute our efforts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Open carry is the customary way. I suspect this is as old as common law. Anyone?


25 posted on 03/24/2017 2:14:16 PM PDT by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Democrats may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: veracious

Shoulder holsters go back a long way so I don’t know about “customary.”

But when you say “Hiding it implied you may be planning to do something evil with it,...” you are suggesting that someone’s intent can be judged by appearances. Or in this case, a lack of appearance. That smacks of thought crime.


26 posted on 03/24/2017 2:26:56 PM PDT by TigersEye (We all have a stake in MAGA! We all need to contribute our efforts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson