Posted on 04/07/2017 3:12:04 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Did you see the pictures of Kushner in his blue blazer and a bullet proof vest? It looked like he was on a prep school field trip to see a war. The vest even had his name written on it looking like his mom wrote it with a Sharpie. What a tool.
There is an America First agenda? Doesn’t look like it to me.
Bannon. Ivanka and husband are declared libs with liberal ideas. Let them play the role of president’s daughter and son in law that we elected them to do.
Without doubt, Steve Bannon.
I tried to warn people Trump was an NYC liberal. He only used Bannon to get elected. Now the NYC liberal agenda will take over. You havent seen nothing yet
Kek. Was his name on his lunch bag too? Dukakis would laugh at that picture.
Dukakis came to mind when I saw the picture, too. Nobody elected this guy. What is he doing making trips overseas to discuss policy? What a crock.
My choice would be the one who doesn’t agree with Trump that the House Freedom Caucus is the problem.
1) Steve Bannon or 2) Kushner & Ivanka
Forced to choose between those two, I'd opt for Bannon in a heartbeat, and every time.
Having said that, there can be no doubt that both played critical roles in helping get President Trump elected and, indeed, it might very well still be the case that they both remain crucial to his ongoing success—one for ideological reasons, and the other perhaps for more personal ones. President Trump is willing to get good advice from more than one source, and I think that's a reasonable and practical executive arrangement.
It simply flies in the face of everything we know about Donald Trump to think that he would be easily manipulated by anybody, including his beloved daughter. There's just zero evidence that he's anything other than his own man. That's what makes all this baseless speculation about "manipulation" so utterly comical.
Ideologically speaking, I'd be happy if Steve Bannon himself were the President. Since that's not the case, I sincerely hope that Bannon remains in a position of maximum influence as the President's chief advisor.
If Bannon is ever ousted—he's on record as saying that he will never quit—then the alarm bells in my head would start going off left and right, but barring such a terrible and unexpected development, I maintain supreme faith in the overall positive direction of the Trump administration and its policies.
Her mother was still a foreign national when she was born, so she is ineligible.
(not that anyone cares about that anymore)
Not whoever is doing it right now.
It's a vanity thread posted in News.
Well done there, faker.
Steve Bannon and Newt Gingrich.
She was born in the USA and her father is a citizen at the time of her birth. She is a natural born citizen.
the constitution doesn’t say both parents have to be natural born citizens if the person was born here they are NBC’s
I never said the parents had to be natural born citizens, they just have to be citizens.
Children of foreign national parents inherit the nationality of their foreign national parent(s).
Born here of citizen parents.
No foreign birth
No foreign parent(s)
No foreign citizenship(s)
So by your standard every anchor baby with no allegiance to the USA is eligible to be President?
Nymag has interesting article. Bannon has list of promises made. Syria goes against list. Thats why he wasn’t for it. Prince Kushner doesnt care about the promises
Also..cohn was behind healthcare debacle. Bannon says they aren’t fighting. They are debating.
Not you
Stupid question
So by your standard every anchor baby with no allegiance to the USA is eligible to be President?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Actually, yes. But, it’s not my standard.
Here is a long explanation from the Constitution Society.
http://www.constitution.org/abus/pres_elig.htm
Neither. It should be me. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.