Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Building Plan: How One Public-Private Deal Hit a Bumpy Road
NBC News ^ | April 5, 2017 | Jane C. Timm

Posted on 04/12/2017 10:10:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Texas had high hopes for the southern segments of SH 130, a 41-mile stretch of the high-speed toll road east of San Antonio.

The state had put off building that stretch of road until a pair of investors stepped forward and offered what sounded like a great deal: Texas would get a big check for turning the rights to build and operate the toll road over to a private entity, a move that would give the state a new highway and a share of the tolls. The state would own the road and rake in revenue, but wouldn't have to put up the cash for its construction.

That's the kind public-private partnership model that President Donald Trump and some conservatives say the nation needs to rebuild its crumbling infrastructure without adding to the debt and deficit. Trump vowed a $1 trillion infrastructure plan funded by public-private partnerships in his first joint address to Congress in January and hired an expert in such deals, D.J. Gribbin, as the special assistant to the president for infrastructure policy. Since then, few details of Trump's plan have been released.

But a decade after Texas and its partners first shook hands, the corporation running the road is in bankruptcy — with more than $430 million still owed to U.S. taxpayers stemming from a loan approved by the U.S. Department of Transportation when Gribbin was general counsel in 2008 — and more than a billion owed to other investors, too.

It's the latest in a slew of toll road public-private partnerships that have fallen apart in the wake of the recession 10 years ago, at times leaving taxpayers struggling to recover their investment. The pitfalls could serve as a yellow caution light for lawmakers considering Trump's plan.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: austin; bankruptcy; cdas; cintra; infrastructure; maga; p3s; ppps; privateinvestment; privatization; sh130; spending; texas; tolls; transportation; zachry
The first in a two-part series, in case anybody's interested in reading the sequel when it comes out.
1 posted on 04/12/2017 10:10:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Somebody didn’t build that...


2 posted on 04/12/2017 10:14:49 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is the mud shark in your mythology.


3 posted on 04/12/2017 10:16:20 PM PDT by Eddie01 (Is this the old loft with the paint pealng off it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

SH130 failed because nobody uses it.


4 posted on 04/13/2017 12:19:09 AM PDT by SanchoP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I’m okay with that type of public/private partnership.

That is how the national highway system was built.


5 posted on 04/13/2017 1:53:30 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP
I use the part that goes from State Hwy 183 around Austin to Georgetown. Not sure if that is 130 or not.

Hate driving through Austin but going toward SA not sure why anyone would not just use 35. Does seem like a waste.

6 posted on 04/13/2017 3:14:04 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

SH130 failed because nobody uses it.

I used it when I was trucking. It was the most reliable way to get around Austin and San Antonio traffic headaches when I was driving the Dallas to Laredo route twice a week. It was deserted especially on the southern stretch from Sequin to Mustang Ridge. Loved it. Then again, the company was paying the tolls.


7 posted on 04/13/2017 3:30:36 AM PDT by CARTOUCHE (Deep State has a tap root.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A convenient story meant to show we can’t build a wall.


8 posted on 04/13/2017 3:42:40 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Drain the swamp. Build the wall. Open the Pizzagate. I refuse to inhabit any safe space.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

A convenient story meant to show Trump can’t build anything.

Did you see these stories about the public-private partnership of the Chicago Skyway when Obama was president?

BTW how is that Chicago Skyway doing now? If it is making money for the private investors than clearly those private investors robbed Chicago.

But if it is losing money for the private investors then clearly the private sector is incompetent and despicable. ;)


9 posted on 04/13/2017 4:14:35 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"The state had put off building that stretch of road until a pair of investors stepped forward......"

There's a reason Texas "put off building that stretch of road". It simply duplicates Interstate 35, which is already in place, and it's free. The tolls on 130 are quite high.

Austin has horrible traffic congestion. The new parts of 130 do nothing to fix that. They all lie south of Austin, where the traffic is manageable. This was simply the wrong road, in the wrong place. It has no bearing, whatsoever, on what Trump might do.

10 posted on 04/13/2017 5:42:28 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Am I misunderstanding this?

Investors offered to build the highway in exchange for tolls. They built it. They didn’t make what they hoped in tolls.

But the highway still got built.


11 posted on 04/13/2017 6:09:12 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SanchoP

I use it, lol, about 3 times per year.

It’s the best highway in Texas with posted speed limit of 85mph.

It’s use is way up and one day it will no doubt pay for itself ten times over. The initial financial plan was not designed with enough flexibility to react to reality on the ground long term.


12 posted on 04/13/2017 8:25:44 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas; CARTOUCHE

In the dozen + times on I-10 between SA and Houston,I have never seen a vehicle use it. On the plus side it still looks brand new.


13 posted on 04/13/2017 9:29:03 AM PDT by SanchoP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson