Skip to comments.
NYT Refuses To Use Term ‘Female Genital Mutilation’ Because It’s ‘Culturally Loaded’
Daily Caller ^
| 4/23/17
| Amber Randall
Posted on 04/24/2017 8:51:32 AM PDT by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: markomalley
41
posted on
04/24/2017 10:35:44 AM PDT
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: markomalley
To the NYT this is nothing but modification surgery, perfectly legit.
To: timestax
43
posted on
04/24/2017 10:36:55 AM PDT
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: timestax
44
posted on
04/24/2017 10:38:48 AM PDT
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: Karoo
Mais oui........certainment.
45
posted on
04/24/2017 11:05:29 AM PDT
by
Liz
(Shutting down conservatives' free speech IS a form of hate speech. samtheman)
To: woodmiser
Thank god my parents didn’t have it done to me. Why? What is the benefit of foreskin? Please be specific.
If it can reduce the risk of contracting AIDS, what is the problem?
46
posted on
04/24/2017 11:14:19 AM PDT
by
FatherofFive
(Islam is EVIL and needs to be eradicated)
To: FatherofFive
You might do some research on the negatives of circumcision. Removes much of your nerves that are naturally there for pleasure. Circumcised penises become less sensitive to contact because the foreskin is not there. Constant rubbing causes a thickening of the thing skin of the head. Rather be natural.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
