Posted on 05/08/2017 9:07:12 AM PDT by xzins
Agreed.
It is extremely discerning that there are so many in our country who try to hinder Trump’s attempt to keep the nation safe from terrorism.
I read somewhere on FR that someone is going to sue over the new health plan if it becomes law.
That will be truly interesting, because the 9th circuit will probably strike it down.
You may want to think this through.
If immigrants aren't subject to our jurisdiction then they aren't subject to our laws - by definition.
All this legal maneuvering can be circumvented if we can designate Islam to be a political movement instead of a religion of peace. Best solution would be to reject it altogether.
My reading of the Constitution makes it clear the only gov entity that can try a sitting president for anything (High crimes and misdemeanors) including actions of a President while in office is Congress. Courts are preempted
“Roberts voted with the 4 liberals in a case about allowing states to sue banks...”
I was thinking about his vote on the ACA (obamacare) — Clearly the admin was holding something over his head.
Congress has authorized lower federal courts to have “concurrent jurisdiction” with the SC over cases such as a state vs. the Feds. This jurisdiction needs to be removed by Congress. Simply changing SC justices won’t solve the root of the problem.
Good point, but that’s how many act anyway. . .however, failing to observe our laws makes them subject to immediate deportation regardless of being a legal or illegal immigrant.
My point is no Artical 3 court can be above the other two branches - especially when the Constitution gives only congress the power to try a sitting President for all crimes and misdemeanors.
Don’t these Travelers(LOL) need a Visa anyway so no Visa no travel
It’s going to be broadcast on CSPAN at 1:30 CT.
The fines paid by the banks went to the very same community organizers that forced the banks to give risky loans to minorities to begin with.
I thought they were still letting the UN do the vetting. How do you extremely vet someone from a place like Syria anyway?
It is a political movement that uses religion as a means of subverting cultures.
The fact that this huge issues in Trump’s presidency is being heard right now as we speak on CSpan is reason to have it in breaking news.
I heard on Fox the other day that they are requiring 5 years of all social media used before they’ll give clearance.
I thought that was ingenious. It is extreme vetting.
Upholding Trump’s EO should be a slam dunk. It is blatantly, simplisticly OBVIOUS that the language of the 1st and 14th Amendments has nothing to do with foreign refugees outside of the United States. They are not under the “jurisdiction” of any state. Not to mention the clear constitutional authority of the POTUS to make unilateral decisions in this area....
So of course the libtards will find all sorts of convoluted trains of b.s. to try to make up NEW amendments that they wish had existed in place of the ones that actually do exist.
btw, even if it could be accepted that the EO in some ways disadvantaged foreign Muslims (even though it is directed at countries and not religion), that in no way could be a violation of the 1st Amendment which says that CONGRESS (no reference to the President) shall not ESTABLISH a national religion here in the USA. Disfavor abroad toward one of MANY religions in the world in no way establishes one particular religion here in the USA.
The libtards are always just making stuff up, out of whole cloth. Too often the courts let them do it as judges are too often happy to join in the fun.
Praying Trump finds favor with the judges..........In Jesus name Amen
I live in constant fear that Trump will deport my illegal alien ex-wife who lives at 23 N 32nd Street, New York NY. Third floor apt 311. She arrive home around 5 PM.</s >
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.