Skip to comments.A Global Warming Surprise
Posted on 05/11/2017 12:00:40 PM PDT by detective
Exploring some of the intricacies of GW [Global Warming] science can lead to surprising results that have major consequences. In a recent invited talk at the Heartland Institutes ICCC-12 [Twelfth International Conference on Climate Change], I investigated three important topics: 1. Inconsistencies in the surface temperature record. 2. Their explanation as artifacts arising from the misuse of data. 3. Thereby explaining the failure of IPCC to find credible evidence for anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The is no such thing as global warming science. There are only liars and thieves.
It’s May 11th and it’s 58 degrees outside. Normally it’s 75. Global Warming is back!
Yes...Global Warming causes Global Cooling...
Everyone knows this. The ‘temperate station’ measurement methods are not scientific by any definition. The only reliable data is from NASA (satellite) and it shows zero warming for 14-15 years now.
There are so many variable the “climate scientists” are just not taking into account.
they cannot be taken seriously until they do.
Things like urban heat islands, geological time CO2 levels, volcanic output, H2O, solar magnetic fields, earth’s magnetic fields, surface albedo, etc etc....
It would be funny as hell if we went into global cooling due to china’s pollution because we were afraid of “muh CO2” so we restricted factories on our shores out of existence so they went to china and produced more atmospheric sulfates which lead to cooling...
Just like how the welfare state was supposed to raise people out of poverty led to more i8nstitutional poverty.
But then again libtards never take into account the negative unintended consequences of their well meaning misguided intentions.
These morons are worried about the air when China is ruining the world’s water supply with Mercury.
The environmental disaster that is China is real and generational.
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November 18 !
Since Trump entered the 16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the 18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.
In fact, if Justice Gorsuch turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February 18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably havent been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitutions Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal governments powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal governments limited powers listed below.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added]. Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
I sure hope so!
Just shows how powerful the MSM is because when you search for “mini-ice age + sunspots” you get a load of scientists who are warning us of what is really coming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.