To: huldah1776
A B-1b flying at 50,000 ft can do more damage with precision weapons...to precise targets on the ground...than a squadron of A-10’s.
Armor, vehicles, reinforced emplacements...none out of reach for destruction. Especially when using CBUs.
13 posted on
06/16/2017 11:55:43 AM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Mariner
A B-1b flying at 50,000 ft can do more damage with precision weapons...to precise targets on the ground...than a squadron of A-10’s.I believe that.
19 posted on
06/16/2017 12:02:46 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies Tell me where is sanity?)
To: Mariner
So if there are six enemy tanks you think it would be more efficient to send a B1 than a A-10!!!
23 posted on
06/16/2017 12:07:22 PM PDT by
ontap
To: Mariner
It would. But what if my Marine is 50 yards from the guy shooting at him?
25 posted on
06/16/2017 12:09:34 PM PDT by
huldah1776
( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
To: Mariner
By the time the B1B got there the firefight would be over.
34 posted on
06/16/2017 12:19:33 PM PDT by
Rebelbase
(Hack-proof tagline.)
To: Mariner
Dream on. A B-1 is an astonishingly bad choice for support of ground troops.
43 posted on
06/16/2017 12:41:11 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
To: Mariner
"A B-1b flying at 50,000 ft can do more damage with precision weapons...to precise targets on the ground...than a squadron of A-10’s."
And how many sorties a day can a B-1b fly from 2000 miles away?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson