Skip to comments.Study blows 'greenhouse theory out of the water'
Posted on 07/09/2017 7:14:54 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
1. Define the correct temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the correct humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the correct mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the correct amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the correct makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the correct amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
NON print version:
The correct anything is whatever requires trillions of dollars to flow through a corrupt government.
Just so. If it isn’t man made global warming, then there’s no trillions in pork to pass around.
From the article:
” However, they face the question, if not carbon dioxide, what is it? noted Lloyd, who also serves as a professor at the Agricultural University of Beijing and was nominated by the UN IPCC in 2007 as part of the team to share the Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore.
Nikolov and Zeller may have found the answer the sun, . . .
Seems to me that “answer” may have been proposed right here on FR a time or two.
And, we all know how some folks get when you mess with their money. “Their” money. See how that works?
This is a religion, facts do not matter.
Back in the 1970s, POPULAR SCIENCE constantly hammered about “The Greenhouse Effect!” and how it would heat up the world.
Then in the early 1980s they editorialized about their error and would never mention the name again as it was false.
Ten years later, they started on the “Global Warming” nonsense.
Paging Al Gore... please pick up the white courtesy phone...
The fanatical cult of Anthropogenic Global Warming is the modern day version of the flat earth society. One day, if humanity continues, we will look back on this time as we do on the dark ages and with the Trump renasuance we may just have a shot at it.
Humans cannot in principle affect the global climate through industrial emissions of CO2, methane and other similar gases or via changes in land use, he added. All observed climatic changes have natural causes that are completely outside of human control.
Praise the Lord, this is such music to my ears. Scott Pruitt needs to put neutral scientists on the PEER review of their research IMMEDIATELY and make this the official stance of the EPA, assuming their conclusions are true and can be verified. It makes too much sense. The denser and more compressed the air, the hotter is it going to be. Thin air is cold. Dense air is warm. Makes some sense.
You get an A+ for sharing this. I am ecstatic that somebody has generated scientific research finding an alternative and plausible theory of planetary warming to challenge the junk science of the man-caused global warming hoax.
The winning this year is overwhelming.
This is the most real reporting that I’ve seen on this scientific debate than I’ve read in all of the LameStream stuff combined. I wish I had the technical chops to be able to read and comprehend the paper itself.
The atmosphere’s density is all that matters for temperature. The composition of the atmosphere doesn’t influence the temperature. There could be no water vapor, or half water vapor, or 1% CO2, or 50% CO2.
The planetary temperature would still be the same and would be based primary on solar activity and how it heats that dense air and how the dense air retains that heat and for how long.
Atmospheric composition would make a big difference to plants and animals but as far as the temperature, weather and climate, it would make no difference at all. Only air pressure matters.
So simple, it is BRILLIANT.
Carbon dioxide cannot possibly play the role assigned to it by the pseudo-scientific “community”. First, because its concentration is so LOW, in relation to the other components of the atmosphere, and second, because the compound cannot behave in any known manner to either retain heat or transfer that heat content to any other medium.
Water Vapor has the necessary quantity and the physical characteristics to effect a great deal of heat transfer, both by absorption of the heat (through something called “heat of fusion” and “heat of vaporization”) and the highly effective transfer of that heat to the radiation OFF the earth at nighttime, while that side of the earth is turned away from the sun.
The sun itself is subject to varying amounts of radiation emitted, of which the earth only catches a VERY small portion, the remainder shooting off into the outer reaches of space, to unimaginable distances.
We better hope we don’t spring a leak then. ;-)
Great idea to link to the print version - thanks!
PV=nRT is the formula for the ideal gas law.
It says the pressure x volume of any gas = a constant x a constant x temperature.
So as P pressure goes up, T temperature goes up.
Makes complete sense that the rising air pressure of a planet would cause a rise in temperature. And what would cause the rising air pressure. The sun. Solar activity. As the air absorbs heat from solar storms, it becomes more active and increases pressure, which increases atmospheric temperature.
This is too simple. It is brilliant. AND it explains observed warming on other planets, which obviously the junk IPCC model can’t do since it is a completely inaccurate model based on crap and propaganda.
PV=nRT explains our planetary warming and cooling. The more or less active the sun is with more or less solar storms and solar flares causes the fluctuations in earth’s temperature when the atmosphere changes pressure in response to absorbing extra solar energy, or conversely absorbing less solar energy. More is hotter. Less is cooler.
This is brilliant.
Scott Priut needs this PEER reviewed immediately, confirm it, and make it the official EPA policy. This stands the IPCC and CO2 as a pollutant completely on its head.
Oh, the “settled science” media and politicians will go kicking and screaming but at some point the truth will be impossible to deny.
Oh wonderful day!
I think gravity makes it pretty hard for atmospheric particles to go on a prison break from the earth. I don’t know what happens during the cyclical polar reversal when the earth’s protective magnetism minimizes, but I think that just lets more solar radiation in. It can’t let atmospheric components out.
Good thing gravity can’t be defeated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.