Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian oligarch hired lawyer who met Donald Trump Jr and also paid the shadowy research company...
The Daily Mail ^ | 7/12/2017 | Alana Goodman

Posted on 07/13/2017 4:35:39 AM PDT by browniexyz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: browniexyz
McCain sent an aide to London to pick up the dirty dossier, and hand-delivered it to Comey. Then Comey requested the Jan 6 one-on-one meeting with Trump to discuss the dirty dossier. (This is why Trump thought private meetings with the FBI director were SOP.) Then Comey leaked word of the meeting and the dirty dossier to the NYT, putting the deep state coup into motion.


61 posted on 07/13/2017 6:28:26 AM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

So lets say this wasnt kremlin approved but lower people trying to curry favor with putin.. In my mind..there is no doubt they were implying chaika in that email.

So what do you think the fallout will be since the whole thing blew up..especially since so many people here are trying to pin this on U.S...which would mean russian players possibly turned ..putin has to be wondering


62 posted on 07/13/2017 6:28:30 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: jjotto; drpix

The President didn’t send *any* US Attorney nominees to the Senate until a month ago. The case would have been handled 100% by Obama appointees and career people.

Sessions would likely have known little about the case. The DAG, who does the actual coordination of prosecution, had only been in office a few weeks. Cases aren’t settled that fast. This would have been a Sally Yates/Lynch decision.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

you make a valid point

just another example of how polluted the swamp is.


63 posted on 07/13/2017 6:31:36 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown

Good to see you on again my friend.

Judge Bharara was also involved in the Halkbank in Turkey. Erdogan and family oil money gold deal?

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/03/turkish-banker-arrested-new-york.html

I know that NY is a money/banking center, but it this a coincidence or are they possibly connected politically?


64 posted on 07/13/2017 6:32:12 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Time has a cover of Don Jr. From a purely media perspective its creative. ...but they should have done similar with hillary


65 posted on 07/13/2017 6:40:02 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TTFlyer

You said it! Mueller and his swamp things are the powder keg looking for any spark at all. It’s coming, no doubt about it.


66 posted on 07/13/2017 6:40:28 AM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thinden
Psshhh......That makes me feel a lot better!
67 posted on 07/13/2017 6:42:29 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
It’s increasingly looking like it was the Obama administration who colluded with the Russians to try to entrap the Trump campaign.

So, when is the DOJ going to shop for a friendly judge (like the left does) and prosecute actual espionage and "collusion"?

68 posted on 07/13/2017 6:44:53 AM PDT by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz

Ron Dellums name over and over with this whole thing.


69 posted on 07/13/2017 6:46:05 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Prosecute the win. Run up the score.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

So lets say this wasnt kremlin approved but lower people trying to curry favor with putin.. In my mind..there is no doubt they were implying chaika in that email.

So what do you think the fallout will be since the whole thing blew up..especially since so many people here are trying to pin this on U.S...which would mean russian players possibly turned ..putin has to be wondering


That was just some BS to secure the meeting, IMO. It seems tehre is a sort of Oligarch tax in Russia. In exchange for the goverment looking the other way at the Oligarch’s corruption they are expected to do work on behalf of the Russian government. It’s been widely reported that Putin hates the Magnitsky act. So that an Oligarch would be campaigning against it shouldn’t be a surprise.


70 posted on 07/13/2017 6:48:22 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: drpix; Liz; HarleyLady27; Lazamataz; Kaslin; artichokegrower
Timeout.... There is an elephant in the room.

<> Did the $6,000,000 flow into the U.S. Treasury?

<>Did a special non-profit get the $6-million?

.
<>Jeopardy Bonus Question--Remember this is a money laundry--

71 posted on 07/13/2017 6:53:09 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

I agree it was BS..notice the guy isnt named. I just meant In terms of being implicated. He has to be mad about that

Foreign policy site has up an article saying this escapade is a throw back to the Wild East days


72 posted on 07/13/2017 6:54:39 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
You said it! Mueller and his swamp things are the powder keg looking for any spark at all. It’s coming, no doubt about it.

The Special Investigator has to be disbanded PERIOD

Take the flak now before it is too late

I am surprised somebody as smart as Trump didn't see this coming
73 posted on 07/13/2017 6:54:51 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz

AND NOW it comes out she had an expired visa? That Loretta Lynch allowed her to stay illegally to entrap Trump?


74 posted on 07/13/2017 6:57:05 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Good point. $6 million seems an awfully small settlement if DoJ had evidence for a $230 million crime; they definitely did not want to go to court. My guess is the original charges were contrived to gain leverage over this Russian businessman. Once Trump emerged as a candidate and was targeted, DoJ recognized the opportunity they had developed, settling for a low amount he’d rather pay than hassle with it, plus providing some “services” via an attorney known to GPS Fusion and Obama’s Ambassador to Russia. N.V. said her reason for entering the US was to work on the money-laundering case. Quite true if setting up Trump was the key to the settlement.


75 posted on 07/13/2017 7:03:55 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Who received the $6-million?
This is a laundry.

76 posted on 07/13/2017 7:05:50 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21
Trump’s private security caught the surveillance as soon as it went active and Team Trump started feeding bogus info to the FISA tap listeners from the very beginning.

I'm glad you posted this, because I thought I was nuts for thinking this was the case. This would go a long way toward explaining why Trump's won the election mainly by winning Rust Belt states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin that weren't even considered "swing states" by most prognosticators heading into Election Day. I've speculated that the surveillance of the Trump campaign picked up a bunch of phone conversations and e-mail traffic with staged arguments between senior campaign staffers over why their candidate was holding so many rallies in states where he didn't have a chance in hell of winning. LOL.

I don't know how the "Trump private security" caught the surveillance, unless the Feds were using something inside the building that was detected in a sweep of bugs and other listening devices. It was probably just as likely that they got wind of this through a mole inside the FBI, NSA or U.S. Justice Department.

77 posted on 07/13/2017 7:21:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm Reynolds

Thanks for clarifying that. I stand corrected on it. I read the general description of the two dollar amounts without realizing that it could have been much more complex than that.


78 posted on 07/13/2017 7:24:51 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
I'll take it one step further ...

One of the things you'll notice about the media coverage of these events over the last six months is that they tend to present things as "bombshells" (even if they later end up amending or retracting the story because they got key facts wrong). I believe this is done for three reasons, and the third one probably plays a bigger role in it than anyone realizes:

1. It generates ratings and readership.

2. It attempts to discredit the Trump administration.

3. It establishes an immediate perception of potential wrongdoing in the public eye, which provides a retroactive justification for invasive and potentially illegal surveillance methods conducted on the Trump team by the Obama administration.

79 posted on 07/13/2017 7:31:14 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

All that you say is true.

That’s why there needs to be some investigation of the FISA warrants and documents concerning Susan Rice’s activities in unmasking. That they are hiding those in storage for the yet to be built Obama Presidential Library tells you how damning they must be.

Along that line, I have to ask: In this day and age, what US government documents are only in original form and not available digitally somewhere on government computers? How can anyone say with a straight face that documents from the last administration are sequestered in a box somewhere, so they can’t be looked at?


80 posted on 07/13/2017 7:46:31 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson