Posted on 07/22/2017 5:56:42 AM PDT by Gamecock
I’m not worried about racism
Or chauvinism
Again search for domestic abuse, it is endless. More time and resources are spent on politics and internet/promotion than actually solving problems.
But they do have vaginas....hence the cruelty of nature
Thank you. Too tired to do my own research. 8~)
The LAPD was ordered years ago to not so much as whisper the words “Islam” or “Muslim” in reference to a crime.
I have to wonder how many PDs have been similarly gagged nationwide.
Islam gets nowhere near the credit it deserves for murders and assaults on women.
“Once again, the violence (and myriad other crimes) committed by deranged, jealous, borderline personality, alcoholic/drug user women against their boyfriends/husbands/exes merits not a single line in this article.”
My understanding is that violence against men is not reported frequently enough to make statistical derivations. Some have taken a stab at guessing that less than 2% of men report such violence to the police and then only when it results in severe injuries and property destruction.
If men want to improve violence against men the best thing to do is start an education campaign trying to teach them not to just walk that kick to the nuts off and report the assault.
And no one is talking about female abuse/murder of their “intimate” partner and feminism that encourages females to attack men. . .but men are never allowed to hit back.
Women engage in violence against men more and more, and some studies show females abuse their male partners than men. (http://www.saveservices.org/2012/02/cdc-study-more-men-than-women-victims-of-partner-abuse/).
Try and find a shelter or support group dedicated to assisting males.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence
http://time.com/2921491/hope-solo-women-violence/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bari-zell-weinberger-esq/its-time-to-acknowledge-m_b_8292976.html
Perhaps they weren’t bitter until the ex took everything. . .perhaps.
There is rarely a post on FR where a quote from Seinfeld wouldn’t apply.
I have seen here on FR many posts about the fact that women DO NOT HAVE THE SAME PHYSICAL STRENGTH AS MEN and the military and fire and police departments have often lowered their standards to accommodate women.
I agree with that, so I don’t think that most men are in much physical danger from most women.
.
That is interesting. It does not answer my question, “By whom are men murdered?” however. Also, neither your information nor that in the article seems to say whether the “partners” in question, who murdered or otherwise victimized , were opposite-sex or same-sex.
How can we even discuss this, when we’re supposed to believe people don’t even have a sex, only a “gender” that changes at whim?
Which is typical PC bullsh!t of the sort you see on agenda driven television programming such as The Closer.
It's always the boyfriend.
"Approximately one-third of the victims were between the ages of 18 and 29, and most were black or Hispanic, the investigators found."
That stat right there tells you that husbands are not the murderers -- because black and Hispanic females don't marry their "intimate partners."
These studies have been analyzed over and over again, and invariably when husbands are removed, there is barely a noticeable blip in the stats (and this remains true if you include white females and Asians.)
CDC wants you to take everything away from these numbers except the truth: The problem isn't guns, it isn't poor impulse control, it isn't failure to properly assess the violent tendencies of your boyfriend, it isn't a lack of police or social worker training. There is one simple solution: Don't open your legs for a man who won't marry you, or isn't married to you.
I'm a 5'-11", 250# + male.
If there is a call of domestic abuse in my house, I'm going to jail. Even if I made the call.
Even if I have bruises on my face.
If she has bruises on her wrists, from me trying to stop her from hitting me, I'm going to jail.
For male victims: 13.5% reported the victimization to the police, in 1.6% of the cases the perepetrator was arrested.
None were convicted, and none did jail time.
The victim obtained a restraining order in 3.5% of the victimizations.
Average 3.5 victimizations per male victim, 3.4 per female victim.
The percentages above are calculated from the data on the table below.
Police take reports for female victims significantly more than for male victims. They do absolutely nothing for male victims significantly more than for female victims.
Over six times as many male perpetrators as female perpetrators are prosecuted. Female perpetrators received no convictions and, obviously,no jail time.
Men get few restraining orders. When they do, women violate them more often.
About half the men, and over two-thirds of the women, violate restraining orders against them.
Every time these studies are re-examined by conservative think tanks they discover that leaving wives and husbands out of the equation changes the statistic no more than leaving out or including any other family members who live in the home.
Including husbands is part of an agenda driven war on men, and part of a war on marriage.
It's boyfriends, casual sexual partners, and exes who kill, not husbands and wives.
Boyfriends are a much bigger threat than husbands.
In any case, careful selection of "partners" is important.
So I did a search and found that
1.9% of men are gay
1.2% of women are lesbian
1.3% of men are bi-sexual
2.2% of women are bi-sexual
From this I would figure that this has very little affect on the numbers.
These studies routinely reach the same conclusions which have nothing to do with the problem. Heritage and a number of think tanks have retrospectively dissected these studies, and the discovery is ... "surprise!" Married people do not kill each other. Husbands are thrown in as part of a war on men.
You don't have to take my word for it, examine what's in the study itself. It includes only states with large urban populations. Why do you think that is? It concludes most of the murders involve blacks and Latinas. We know statistically that blacks and Hispanics do not marry their sexual partners.
Connect the dots.
Don't be fooled. This is really a study about "boyfriends." Husbands are included as part of an agenda.
I wonder what percent involved a husband who discovers he’s going to lose it all in the divorce thanks to our court system that favors women over men.
Don't take my word for it. Look at the study. It involves only states with large urban populations, and concludes that most of the victims are black or Latina. We know statistically that blacks and Hispanics do not marry their sexual partners.
This study, and all of the other studies like it, invariably are studies about "boyfriends." Yes, there are husbands who abuse their wives, but the number of wives who beat their husbands is not zero. The difference is -- again, statistics with no agenda bear this out -- when the abused spouse is educated, they leave the marriage.
Sorry, but the claim that husbands kill their wives will not hold up under scrutiny. When you correct for the likelihood that any relative living in the home is more likely to kill you -- duh, makes sense -- husbands and wives simply are not a big part of the murder statistic compared with uncommitted sex partners.
I agree with that, so I dont think that most men are in much physical danger from most women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.