Eric Parker Ripped from Witness Stand – Bunkerville Retrial

Oathkeepers ^ | 8/11/17

[Texas Fossil]

What possible defense can now be presented?

I do not support civil disobediance, but the Constitution clearly provides for a fair jury trial. That is not what this is.

[veracious]

Re-post, but yes, the beast will shred those who claim they have any rights; especially those from YHVH.

[robroys woman]

Based on this single event, if I was on the jury, I would acquit.

[robroys woman]

Thanks to the internet, a LOT of americans are aware of jury nullification. If there is even one juror here that is aware of this, the best the prosecutors can hope for in this case is a hung jury. I’d have been so pi$$ed at that judge that I’d find them not guilty out of principle - even if all the facts of the case pointed to guilt.

[Kalamata]

Short of armed resistance, this is the best hope.

[robroys woman]

The judge was angry because she had lost control of the outcome of this case. And this case is a VERY big deal for the deep state. They simply MUST win.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Yes if that happened with me on the jury I would vote to acquit.

[Delta 21]

[Texas Fossil]

Was the title the same? I checked before posting and found nothing. However I posted using my cell phone, not the best tool for this. I’m on a trip, my old laptop has issue with https certificates, won’t work here. Newer laptop has keyboard problem. Sorry

[Nifster]

Chicago Eight trial

Ain’t new

[Louis Foxwell]

The judge will get precisely what she most fears, acquittal by nullification. There is no other viable option. She has poisoned the jury with her antics and broad brush opinions.

[Texas Fossil]

Agree

[Texas Fossil]

The judge said that is not admissible defense.

[Texas Fossil]

No, not new. And the number of people acquitted in federal cases is very small.

[morphing libertarian]

Not an attorney as you shall soon see. Shouldn’t the defendant decide on what his defense is and shouldn’t the jury decide if it is admissible.

[dragnet2]

Bookmark

[PrairieLady2]

. I’d have been so pi$$ed at that judge that I’d find them not guilty out of principle - even if all the facts of the case pointed to guilt.
++++++++++++++++++++

Me too!

[DaxtonBrown]

The silver lining is I don’t see how these trials stand up against appeal.

[dragnet2]

The judge was angry because she had lost control of the outcome of this case. And this case is a VERY big deal for the deep state. They simply MUST win.

That's it.

I learned long ago, the U.S. justice system was becoming increasingly manipulated and corrupted by those in government. This story is a perfect example of that.

[drypowder]

Under GH Bush, then FBI agent Lon Huriuchi murdered Vicki Weaver in cold blood and the government stood in his defense. Then there was the Waco TX massacre of a Christian sect by the FBI and US Army's Delta Forces under Bill Clinton. No government agent nor official has ever been held to account for those civilian murders. Does anything else need to be said respecting citizen's rights under a tyrannical US government?