Posted on 08/21/2017 12:28:28 PM PDT by be-baw
I peruse Lamecherry’s site every once in a while.She is so over the top.
She said that kellyanne hired Indiana (Pence) mafia protection because she hired Rokita’s chief of staff. I don’t think she meant true mafia. She just calls it Indiana Mafia.
There was a lease dispute with Secret Service and they vacated Trump tower. At one point I think they had a trailer out front while they looked for something else.
I don’t quite understand how this all works.
We all believe that Ivanka and Jared are undercutting the nationalist agenda and pulling Trump left.
That’s 100 percent fact on this site.
We all agree that Bannon was/is the main voice of the nationalist agenda.
But the idea of Bannon clashing with/attacking Ivanka and Jared is Fake News.
I mean, this seems 100 percent plausible to me.
Give me a reason why Bannon wouldn’t hate Ivanka and Jared.
Ping : )
If Ivanka gets loud boos, then so be it. She has no right to mess with people’s lives.
>>Didn’t Donald Trump himself promise to leave his adult children back in New York City to run his company?
*********************************************************
An interviewer asked Ivanka if she would be going to Washington DC to help her father in the White House. She smiled, laughed, and replied: “No, I’ll be staying here in N.Y.”, and of course, visiting there from time to time, i.e. personal family visits.
“We all believe that Ivanka and Jared are undercutting the nationalist agenda and pulling Trump left.”
I still get slammed by a few people who claim this isn’t true.
The Ivanka thing is strange.
Ivanka is clearly his favorite child. The brothers acknowledge it. He gives her significant things to do in representing the US.
So how do you still have a relationship with Bannon when he is out to take down your daughter and her husband.
It’s like that reporter on Kushners Observer site that is out to take down Trump and Kushner.
It’s going to be a weird strange time for the next few months.
Many thanks for the PING; I hope that this is true! Though sadly, she’ll still find a way to pour her poison into his ear.
Using the NY Times as a source for anything is like using Stormfront as a source.
>>If Ivanka gets loud boos, then so be it. She has no right to mess with people’s lives.
***********************************************************
Specifically, I resent her exerting influence wrt the Tax Proposal, where she “advocates for women” with her paid maternity leave crap. Why should I, a disabled senior citizen, have to subsidize daycare services for non-familial females?
I believe it too. After reading about how she went all out lobbying for her dad to sign onto the Paris Globull Warming hoax, I'm convinced. It's to President Trump's credit that he was able to ignore all the global warming tears and pleas, not just Ivanka's but Tillerson's too.
Just for the record. I think Ivanka is a very nice young lady and that the President has a lot to be proud of in her. However she has no business in politics or this administration. She needs to be going to tea parties in the Hamptons, maybe even enrolling her kids in cotillion.
Just read the article,and it astonished me——the infighting must be brutal.
This last sentence threw me for a loop-—”But that could swiftly change if Trump, under the influence of Kushner and Cohn, deviates too far from the positions he ran on. If that happens, said one high-level Breitbart staffer, “We’re prepared to help Paul Ryan rally votes for impeachment.”
(Thanks for keeping at me,sometimes I’m my own worst enemy.)
.
First of all, the base elected Trump, not Bannon. Second, if Bannon was really that big of an influence on Trump winning, or even policy decisions since, do you think Trump would have “fired” him, or Bannon (if committed to Trump’s agenda, and not Bannon’s) would have wanted to leave? Trump is a big boy and pretty much defeated the field of 17 stacked against him with Bannon’s help. Bannon will be much more useful in the position he is in....IF, he can focus on advancing Trump’s agenda rather than Bannon’s.
And you know this how? Because the NYT says so?
That was a shocker for me, too.
Just read that again and really, really think on that....First, on what grounds would the impeachment be? Second, do you really think Bannon is going to do anything to assist Paul Ryan? Really?
...*without Bannon’s help...
“Second, do you really think Bannon is going to do anything to assist Paul Ryan? Really? “
—
It was Breitbart spokesperson saying that,not Bannon.
Who knows what could happen,though,the last 6 months have been full of surprises.
.
.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.