Posted on 08/30/2017 10:03:16 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
Let’s try peaceful methods first.
Repeal the 17th Amendment and watch the senate defend the 10th Amendment once again.
Article V.
CW11....on its way
Whole passel of “judges”, deserve to be placed in stocks in the village square and have rotten crap thrown at em.
Another Communist in the judiciary obstructs measures to ensure the safety of American citizens.
This is just another example as to why I think trumps priority should have been filling the 120 judge vacancies around the country. I believe he’s named 40 thus far. With judges, trumps other priorities won’t get implemented.
Another option is for the President to issue an executive order protecting the Texas law, which would probably result in yet another legal fight.
My impression of people like Garcia, Julian Castro, etc. is slightly different. They aren't loyal to Mexico's government per se. Rather, their loyalty is to "La Raza."
It isn't so much that they want the US southwest to become legally part of Mexico. Instead, they want to see a demographic and cultural hegemony of Chicanos and recent Mexican immigrants throughout the region. Their ultimate goal is the complete displacement of Anglo-Americans from the region so that the whole southwest becomes a giant Latin American barrio (with people like Garcia and Castro as the Padrons).
What’s the difference?
You are correct. There is no question the judge’s ruling is outside his authority, but the current court is an unreliable agent in assuring the rule of law is supported.
We were aware in 2008 here on FR of the effect Obama would have on the US. Note my post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2153351/posts?q=1&;page=21
Welcome to New Kenya (Africa U.S.A.)
“Where the law of the jungle has replaced the Law of the Land.”
—
de Texas Fossil
37 posted on 12/23/2008, 3:13:26 PM by Texas Fossil
Also note the title of that article I was commenting to in 2008
“THE REASONS FOR THE FALL OF ROME”
Let no one say that those here on FR “don’t get it”.
It is the ComDem Party. There is no illusion about it.
Many do. It is a fact.
What Garcia and other La Raza types want is a US southwest where they call the shots culturally and politically, but that still enjoys all of the economic, social service, and infrastructure benefits of being a legal part of the US. What they’re too stupid to understand is that you can’t have a US economy and infrastructure if you have Mexican culture and Mexican style institutions.
Unfortunately, this problem started well before Obama, and even before his “family values don’t stop at the Rio Grande” predecessor. America’s demographic transformation started with the Hart-Celler immigration act of 1965, that basically opened the US up to mass Third World immigration. Until Trump’s election, not a single President (sadly, not even Reagan) was willing to say or do very much about it.
” Instead, they want to see a demographic and cultural hegemony of Chicanos and recent Mexican immigrants throughout the region. Their ultimate goal is the complete displacement of Anglo-Americans from the region so that the whole southwest becomes a giant Latin American barrio (with people like Garcia and Castro as the Padrons).”
What the 1986 Amnesty set in motion in California. Made much worse by the ‘Make America Mexico’ Bush Republicans.
I’ve never heard of that act. But that is not surprising, my background is not connected to things related to this.
Another damn Hispanic judge ruling on immigration/sanctuary cities. Isn’t it amazing how Dem judges are always said to be impartial, but Rep judges aren’t. Amazing to me how this idiot, biased. leftist judge can say that policy is free speech. Our legal system is so compromised by these liberal/leftist judges that is is beyond repair. I don’t know why anyone should obey the laws when you have idiots like this, and the idiots in Congress advocating for “special” groups to not have to obey the law.
Yes, it should be so.
What happens in a court room, is seldom predictable.
The Bunkerville cases are an example. A ComDem activist Federal Judge tried to make the defendants totally unable to defend themselves. The Jury saw through it. 2 acquittals and 2 hung juries (11-1). One of those case where the jury practiced what is not speakable, disagreeing with the judge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.