Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Royal Navy Complete first firing Test of a New Air Defence System
Defense Update ^ | Sep 4, 2017 | Tamir Eshel

Posted on 09/04/2017 11:00:53 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

The CAMM missile is seen on its first flight from HMS Argyll. The missile’s clean aerodynamic design provides it with improved performance in the air, while also making it highly compact for installation onboard ship. Photo: MBDA

The Sea Ceptor weapon system recently completed its first successfully firings from HMS Argyll. The frigate is one of three Royal Navy Type 23 frigates being modified with the Sea Ceptor system, replacing the older Sea Wolf. The test is a major milestone for the life-extension program of Type 23 frigates.

HMS Argyll is the first Type 23 to undergo the life-extension program. She will conduct further firing trials of the Sea Ceptor system before deploying to Japan next year. Sea Ceptor will provide the Royal Navy with an improved shield against airborne threats such as the new generation of supersonic anti-ship missiles, fast jets, helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles. Alongside providing robust self-defense, importantly Sea Ceptor defends escort vessels within a maritime task group, such as for the new Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers.

Sea Ceptor uses MBDA’s next-generation Common Anti-air Modular Missile (CAMM), is being fitted to replace the Sea Wolf weapon system on these frigates, as well as the new Type 26 and, it may also be selected for the future Type 31 about to replace them in the Type 23s next decade. The Sea Ceptor development and integration was funded under contracts worth £639m contract and fit them to the Type 23 and Type 26 frigates.

Compared to Sea Wolf, CAMM is faster, has longer range, has a two-way data link, and has a much more advanced seeker, all of which enable the missile to intercept more challenging targets. The missile capable of reaching speeds of up to Mach 3 and will have the ability to deal with multiple targets simultaneously, protecting an area of around 500 square miles (1,300 square Km) over land or sea.

Traditional air defense systems utilize semi-active radar guidance, meaning they rely on a surface-based fire control radar to illuminate the missile’s target. The missile uses an active radar seeker and data link on the missile thus avoiding reliance on the ship’s radar for guidance. This technology enables the ship to employ multi-mission radars and intercept more targets simultaneously, across 360 degrees – something a semi-active system could not do. Its clean aerodynamic design yields improved performance and easier, more compact installation on board. The use of an innovative soft vertical launch system significantly reduces the impact of a traditional “hot launch” missile on both the ship and the crew.

Land Ceptor – the land-based derivative of Sea Ceptor – will replace Rapier in British Army service as the future generation Ground Based Air Defense (GBAD).


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aerospace; armsbuildup; missiledefense; nato; royalnavy; sam; seaceptor

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4851548/Royal-Navy-s-air-defence-missiles-launched-time.html

1 posted on 09/04/2017 11:00:53 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I like that second photo. You don’t see a lot from that perspective.


2 posted on 09/04/2017 11:10:17 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (Maxine Waters for House Minority Leader!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Soft vertical launch, from the pic that means the
motor doesn’t ignite until it’s in the air?


3 posted on 09/04/2017 11:16:33 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Maybe a small motor with a smaller impulse just to push it clear of the VLS cell? Would think that would be more reliable than a pneumatic push.


4 posted on 09/04/2017 11:38:58 AM PDT by Tallguy (Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

England tests new defensive missiles while it welcomes invading hordes of Muslims. Makes perfect sense.


5 posted on 09/04/2017 11:47:00 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

And their military security & engineering is so bad that I’ve read of people who literally walk off the streets and make it into what’s supposed to be high security areas to do valdalism on equipment.


6 posted on 09/04/2017 12:10:54 PM PDT by prophetic (0Bama = 1 illegal president = 32 illegal, unconstitutional & unnecessary CZARS to do his job!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

It really seems the British think inside out.


7 posted on 09/04/2017 12:20:59 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Maybe a small motor with a smaller impulse just to push it clear of the VLS cell? Would think that would be more reliable than a pneumatic push.


It seems a physical piston is involved, then airborne missile is deflected in the correct direction, and the main motor fires.
A good description on wiki -

“...both use a “soft vertical launch” system, whereby the missile is ejected from a tube by a piston. A short booster uses squib thrusters to point the missile at the target before the main motor fires. The lack of toxic fumes on launch makes launches safer for users, avoids corrosion of the launch platform and the lack of exhaust vents allows the launch cells to be much more compact....”

8 posted on 09/04/2017 12:38:11 PM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: az_gila

True, as much as 1/3 the volume of conventional boost-launch VLS is to intercept, direct and re-direct the exhaust gasses back vertically. So, a soft-boost is more efficient use of space.

Now, about the number of reloads carried..... Where are the ammo ships, and what is protecting them?


9 posted on 09/04/2017 1:24:42 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

bookmark


10 posted on 09/04/2017 6:30:37 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az_gila

Interesting. Thanks!


11 posted on 09/04/2017 7:00:37 PM PDT by Tallguy (Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson