what a charming couple...
Posted on 09/10/2017 3:14:37 PM PDT by ItsOnlyDaryl
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is receiving threats after she announced changes to the Title IX program Thursday as it was known under President Obama. Sexual assault abusers are still going to be punished, she emphatically stated, but from now on the accused will be offered due process.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
It has been an issue for at least a decade.
The Four Stages of Conservative Female Abuse
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/03/the-four-stages-of-conservative-female-abuse/
“The things liberals get away with just because they’re talking about conservatives... makes me sick :”
I’m cool with his wife/boyfriend getting their anal mucosa getting ripped to shreds by some fiend democrat too.
Unbelievable.
These people will meet God one day and have some ‘splainin to do.
“Then there was Texas lawyer Rob Ranco, who told the world he would have no issues with DeVos being the victim of sexual abuse.”
https://www.carlsonattorneys.com/team-member/robert-ranco/
Those of you who are from Texas can start here:
https://www.texasbar.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=File_a_Grievance&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=29656
This is some of the abuse that Title IX is causing...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/07/21/catholic-university-found-him-responsible-for-a-sexual-assault-now-hes-suing-the-school/?utm_term=.d27c7c0cf73c#comments
Ranco seems like he has his issues. What a sicko.
"Lawyer Upset With Title IX Changes Is 'OK' With DeVos Being Sexually Assualted"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
As mentioned in related threads, patriots are reminded that the only sex and race-related rights that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect deal only with voting rights as evidenced by the 15th and 19th Amendments, two of the four voting rights amendments. These amendment expressly give Congress the power to legislatively strengthen race and sex rights, but only in the context of voting issues.
But since many of the race and sex-related issues that Title IX deals with are clearly outside the scope of voting rights, President Nixon should not have signed Title IX into law imo, Nixon unthinkingly helping to unconstitutionally expand the already unconstitutionally big federal government’s powers by doing so.
In fact, a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices had clarified the fed’s constitutionally limited powers as follows.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited. [emphasis added] ." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Note that the Founding States had established the federal Senate partly to kill bills that steal unique state powers, the states uniquely having the 10th Amendment-protected power to make non-voting-related race and sex-related laws that the post-17th Amendment ratification feds are now wrongly making.
In fact, regarding many federal civil rights laws, lawmakers are probably exploiting low-information voters, voters who have probably never been taught about the fed’s constitutionally limited powers, in the following way. Career lawmakers “promise” such voters race and sex-related protective laws in order to get elected or reelected, such voters probably not understanding that the feds have no express constitutional authority to make such laws outside the scope of voting issues.
So sadly, like Nixon did by signing Title IX into law, low-information voters are helping to unconstitutionally expand the fed's constitutionally limited powers, trading their votes for unconstitutional federal race and sex-related civil rights protections when such protections don't have anything to do with voting issues.
And speaking of the fed's constitutionally limited powers, consider that although Trump is accomplishing a LOT as president, working hard to put the feds back into their constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited power cage, it remains that since the uniparty Congress wants to get rid of him that his first two years in office are arguably for practice. That being said ...
Drain the swamp sewer! Drain the sewer!
Remember in November 2018 !
Since corrupt Congress is the biggest part of the sewer (imo) that Trump wants to drain, it is actually up to us patriots to drain the sewer in the 2018 elections, patriots supporting Trump by electing as many new members of Congress as they can who will support Trump.
In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the primary ballots.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to make sure that candidates are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed here.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]." —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also, unlike incumbent members of Congress who wrongly remained silent while misguided state officials abridged the constitutionally enumerated rights of citizens during the lawless Obama Administration, patriots need to make sure that candidates on the 2018 primary ballots commit to the following.
Candidates need to commit to making and enforcing 14th Amendment-related laws to prosecute misguided state officials who use state powers to abridge constitutionally enumerated protections, 1st Amendment-protected religious expression and free speech for example, such actions prohibited by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
”14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Again, drain the sewer! Drain the sewer!
what a charming couple...
Title IX of course is the new gold mine for the legal profession. Every university campus has hired a shakedown artist funded by tuition increases. It’s a clever scam and is here to stay.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.