Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TangledUpInBlue

4% is the number after magic gubmint number massaging. I think it is all in the gubmint definition of unemployed and has little or nothing to do with the actual number of people not working. If there are over 90,000,000 working age Americans not in the labor force the true UE number has to be closer to 20% than 4%.


7 posted on 09/13/2017 12:46:02 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jospehm20

I don’t disagree with what you’re saying. However, if a portion of that 90M (is that a correct # by the way) are people who do not want a job (i.e. my friend the stay at home Dad) then the number should revise lower.

That said, we agree it’s not 4%. And likely never will be that low again. The US has become a Service Economy where it used to be mostly a Manufacturing Economy. A lot of the unemployed need to be re-trained because those jobs aren’t coming back. Not in the lifetime of the employees that were phased out.


11 posted on 09/13/2017 1:00:18 PM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson