Skip to comments.Judicial Watch: New Clinton Emails Uncovered, Reveal Additional Mishandling of Classified...
Posted on 09/14/2017 9:58:36 AM PDT by jazusamo
Full title: Judicial Watch: New Clinton Emails Uncovered, Reveal Additional Mishandling of Classified Information
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch today released 1,617 new pages of documents from the U.S. Department of State revealing numerous additional examples of classified information being transmitted through the unsecure, non-state.gov account of Huma Abedin, former Secretary of State Hillary Clintons deputy chief of staff, as well as many instances of Hillary Clinton donors receiving special favors from the State Department.
The documents included 97 email exchanges with Clinton not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date to at least 627 emails that were not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over, and further contradicting a statement by Clinton that, as far as she knew , all of her government emails had been turned over to department.
The emails are the 20th production of documents obtained in response to a court order in a May 5, 2015, lawsuit Judicial Watch filed against the State Department ( Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)). Judicial Watch sued after State failed to respond to a March 18, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking: All emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-state.gov email address.
On September 11, 2009, the highly sensitive name and email address of the person giving the classified Presidential Daily Brief was included in an email forwarded to Abedins unsecure email account by State Department official Dan Fogerty.
The State Department produced many more Clinton and Abedin unsecured emails that were classified:
If Hillary has been elected, would she be immune from impeachment for these matters because they occurred before her election?
Off the Wall Ping!
Contact to be added.
Nothing is happening to her now, and she wasn’t elected. I can’t imagine anything happening to her if she was elected.
The pile of evidence keeps getting higher & higher, but Crooked Hillary is still on TV everyday treated like a Queen Goddess.
It is really disgusting & I am completely baffled. What do Sessions & President Trump have to gain by not going after her?
I give Judicial Watch alot of credit. They get some good results. Problem is the same people they are trying to help
are the ones helping block any investigation. A few dozen email releases a year for a thousand years isn’t going to help.
Sessions should have someone on this as of Jan. 2017. He needs to get moving on the FBI coverup, all Clintons involved, Obama’s people involved and the Clinton Foundation. All this information is worthless unless someone investigates.
Clinton said, “I communicated about classified material on a wholly separate system” than her personal system.
Since she did not have a State Department e-mail address and she says she did not use her private server, what system did she use?
I don’t know the answer but I doubt very strongly that she could be impeached in the present House or any other House.
Remember, “impeachment” is one of those words that has about 6 differing definitions and I claim no special knowledge of which is correct.
It is hard to imagine how a president would be able to carry out the duties of the office with a revoked security clearance which I would think would be the bare utter minimum punishment for the clear mishandling of classified information.
But then again, any time you try to fit “legal consequences” and “Hillary Clinton” in the same sentence, a logical crevasse or sinkhole opens up and swallows any attempt at reconciling any prior human experience with what may be occurring in the present; as well as any nearby collection of facts that might be laying around. Those are usually replaced by a stack of dead bodies.
So, my answer would be “turnips”.
No, because that isn’t protecting Trump.
She would be immune because (D) and no other reason.
Clinton is a condescending & consumate liar. She is a traitor. Sessions will do NOTHING.
How Clinton may have done it
I hear you. JW is doing the work that Justice, the FBI and Congress should be doing.
Only the AWANs know for sure.
Gosh, I remember fondly those words from my Communications Security instructors......
“Whether you do it on purpose or by accident, if you violate Communications Security, you will be thrown in prison! Unless you’re Hillary Clinton and then you can sell out this country.”
I wonder which nostril she was plugging when she was trying to sell her fellow Americans into slavery?
Comey and Lynch need to be prosecuted as accomplices.
What evidence do you have that Sessions did not take up the investigation? You are blustering crap for which you actually know nothing at all.
You are merely spouting what has become Free Republic dogma.
Hillary Clinton is a lying, thieving, bullying, cheating, dirty little snot.
Haven’t both parties made it perfectly clear that the Clinton’s are above the law?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.