Skip to comments.MSNBC interrupts interview with Hillary Clinton to watch panda video
Posted on 09/15/2017 6:39:15 AM PDT by Red Badger
She's smarter than I thought. Had to keep her viewer interested and not fall asleep.
Hilliary's head was bobbing like a cork in a hurricane...............
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Yes, they at least had the good graces to show something worth watching!................
Someone in management was probably watching a real time display of their viewer numbers.
This is scripted BS to show how “loving” and sensitive this old demon witch is. Why she even chuckles looking at a panda...when, in her heart, she would love to gut it and make some demonic sacrifice with it.
Panda?? Well, she DID say she was bamboozled.
Or was it gobsmacked?
Having trouble coming up with an appropriate visual for that apart from being spat upon.
Panda = Seth Rich
Panda = Seth Rich
Yes indeed. I now challenge anyone who claims that MSNBC is not a legitimate news organization!
Their ratings probably double from 15 to 30 viewers
I don’t get the video, and I don’t get the Panda Principle. Sorry, Hillary.
For a PANDERER....................
Why is this post worthy for the fourth time?
An animal video to “humanize” (will they ever give up?) HRC, ROTFL.
I didn’t know it was.
Post 7 and 8—
Beat me to it.....Panda / Seth Rich
Seth Rich was unavailable to provide live commentary.
Humanize Hillary, LOL.
How many times have they tried to humanize Hillary, reintroduce her to the American people, show us the alleged softer human side of Hillary? And why do those efforts fall flat? In both 2008 and 2016 her presidential campaigns made efforts to change her image, make her more palatable to voters.
we see the results, that the efforts didn’t pay off.
And then make a panda coat out of it.
I can’t believe some of the nonsense surrounding Hillary’s book tour. Maybe Hillary is a (fill in the blank), and the women she bitches about who didn’t vote for her perceive that about her?
I’ve heard that women are perceptive about other women, in ways that men are not, and that big numbers of women think Hillary is a (fill in the blank). And the result is, critical numbers of women were NOT eager to vote for Hillary, would not vote for a woman candidate, just to have a woman president. The symbolism of having a woman president was less important than the reality of Hillary in the Oval Office.