Skip to comments.
The Senate Finally Listens: Removes Major Obstacle to Conservative Judges
ACLJ ^
| 11 October 2017
Posted on 10/12/2017 8:31:51 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
BTW the 60 vote Senate rule is in MHO un Constitutional. The Constitution provides for the Vice President to cast the deciding vote in ties. With the super majority rule there is no tie. Sic. the Senate is violating the Constitutional rights of the Vice President of the United Stats.
21
posted on
10/12/2017 9:18:27 PM PDT
by
Tuketu
(The Dim Platform is splinters bound by crazy glue. TRUMP is the solvent.)
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain; Whenifhow; LS; GregNH; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; ...
22
posted on
10/12/2017 9:25:55 PM PDT
by
bitt
(The press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literal)
To: arthurus
‘Now we need to work on that 30 days debate’
I believe you mean “30 hours”....
23
posted on
10/12/2017 9:27:49 PM PDT
by
bitt
(The press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literal)
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
There are conflicting reports, and I don’t think this we ant our way.
More status quo.
A G A I N !
24
posted on
10/12/2017 9:28:39 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
I thought it was going to say they removed Mitch McConnell!
25
posted on
10/12/2017 10:10:37 PM PDT
by
leapfrog0202
("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
To: facedown
I don’t see how either of them can do it without a majority vote to change the rules.
26
posted on
10/12/2017 10:17:36 PM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
McConnell can force Grassley off the Judiciary Committee, if he really means business about ending the blue slip tradition. We’ll see how he proceeds.
27
posted on
10/12/2017 10:48:36 PM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain; All
The Keyword “BLUESLIPS” will show all the articles/threads on this recently... FYI
28
posted on
10/12/2017 11:11:53 PM PDT
by
topher
(Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
To: Lurkinanloomin
Even a simple decision like this can’t be made clear and straightforward by McConnell, unbelievable! But so typical of the useless despicable turtle.
29
posted on
10/12/2017 11:20:39 PM PDT
by
miniTAX
To: Zhang Fei
“McConnell can force Grassley off the Judiciary Committee,”
Right after we all see supersonic pigs flying around in the sky.
This is just another typical Good Cop, Bad Cop follow the magic bouncing ball routine.
Grassley gets on our good graces because it ‘appears’ he is working for us and Mitch is tired of handling the hot potato. So he just cleverly passes it off to someone who has the ability to bury it in procedural horsecrap.
30
posted on
10/13/2017 3:22:50 AM PDT
by
mazda77
To: arthurus
McConnell should declare that for the purposes of the 30 days debate per judge that a day equals a work day of eight hours. Then keep the Senate in constant session 24/7, one eight hour session after another. This way the 30 days will be reduced to 10.
To: Zhang Fei
McConnell can’t force Grassley off, he doesn’t have the backing, support to do such a thing.
McConnell is doing this because he is feeling the heat, his poll numbers back in KY are in the tank. He’s trying to change the subject from the fact that he is a loser on repealing Obamacrap and delivering tax reform. He’s a poor leader and it shows.
32
posted on
10/13/2017 5:32:40 AM PDT
by
Hostage
(Article V)
To: Petrosius
...the 30 days debate...
I'm pretty sure that the "requirement" is 30 hours, not 30 days.
33
posted on
10/13/2017 5:41:28 AM PDT
by
BlueLancer
(ANTIFA - The new and improved SturmAbteilung)
To: ichabod1
I dont see how either of them can do it without a majority vote to change the rules.Because it's not actually a rule; it's a tradition, a gentleman's agreement.
34
posted on
10/13/2017 5:49:09 AM PDT
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
I read that this was premature, they are not doing away with the blue slip process. 30 hrs of debate on each confirmation to slow track the confirmations. No?
35
posted on
10/13/2017 5:51:43 AM PDT
by
Old_Grouch
(70 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
To: Petrosius
You misunderstand. McConnell is NOT trying to expedite. He is trying to hinder and ultimately prevent. What he should do is allot one hour for debate for each judge. He is a Democrat(R) trying to minimize Trump's effects.
36
posted on
10/13/2017 6:09:02 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: Petrosius
It’s 30 hours, not 30 days. And there are ways around it.
37
posted on
10/13/2017 6:13:14 AM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: jjotto
For 30 hours, form a special committee for each nominee and have the debates concurrently. The Democrats are abusing the rules. Pay them back with their own coin.
To: Lurkinanloomin
"
Dont believe it until they are confirmed."
That's right!
39
posted on
10/13/2017 8:41:26 AM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
50 of Trumps nominees are pending. 50!
"Today, there are 149 vacancies in the federal judiciary. Of these, over 50 vacancies are judicial emergencies. A judicial emergency is a situation in which there are over 600 case filings per judge and that vacancy has existed for more than 18 months. In other words, a judicial emergency is when there are insufficient judges to timely hear and adjudicate cases; peoples rights are left hanging in the balance."
Currently, there are 50 nominees still pending in the Senate, and many of these nominees would fill these emergency seats and help bring justice to parties in conflict. "
40
posted on
10/13/2017 8:46:44 AM PDT
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson