Dan Rather On Clinton Rape Allegations: Even If They Turn Out To Be True, It Was A Long Time Ago

Townhall.com ^ | November 15, 2017 | Matt Vespa

[TomServo]

Great - we’re using Dan Rather as a defense.

[BipolarBob]

What’s the frequency, Kenneth?

[Jess Kitting]

Dear Mr. Rather (not):

If any of your news stories turned out to be true, that was a long time ago.

[a fool in paradise]

Good enough for Hitlery Rotten Clinton to still be a valid candidate. Not so long ago now, is it?

[rockinqsranch]

Headline: "Dan Rather On Clinton Rape Allegations: Even If They Turn Out To Be True, "It Was A Long Time Ago"

I laugh, because this is so Democrat.

[morphing libertarian]

can someone turn off his mic

[TruthWillWin]

Should ask him if he feels the same about Roy Moore?

[Sasparilla]

If Clinton repeated his bad sexual conduct last week, that would be a long time ago to Dan and fellow cretins. .

[IncPen]

It’s essential to use the Left’s hypocrisy against them mercilessly, endlessly.

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

The only person my father detested more than Rather was Cronkite.

[virgil]

So this feeding frenzy over sex, molestation, sexual harassment, etc. is about giving cover to the Clintons. It’s what it’s beginning to sound like. GTH, both of them.

[DoughtyOne]

It’s not a defense. It just reveals the double standard.

We’re not talking about rape with Moore. We’re not talking about violence.

While one woman has said he tried to force her into sexual activity, she also says it happened in a vacant lot out behind her job site, and folks have come forward to reveal there is no vacant lot there. There isn’t now, and there wasn’t then.

[Bullish]

Dan talks all intellectual, but what he says always exposes that he’s as stupid and ignorant as a bucket of cold piss.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Well so are the allegations against Roy Moore that isn’t stopping the left trashing him 24/7

[Regulator]

When Democrats do it, it isn’t a crime

[TomServo]

I really don't care about the timeline. I do care that we're trotting out liberals as a defense for something we don't know happened.

Additionally, we're pointing fingers as if saying - we'll hell - the liberals get away with it - why shouldn't we? Again - as if Moore is guilty.

To me, it speaks of hypocrisy - for something we don't even know yet.

Like if Clinton got away with it - so should Moore - and we're doing this before all the facts are in.

[Jamestown1630]

ghast·ly

adjective

1. causing great horror or fear; frightful or macabre.

I think the article is somewhat overwrought...

[plain talk]

number three, they've gotta be figuring maybe, just maybe the American public has heard all they want to hear about this and are saying you know, "Next. Let's move on to the next thing.

That is a bold-faced lie