Matthew Dodd
Political party:
Independent (2008–present)
Republican (1999–2007)
Democratic (Before 1999)[1]
Very indecisive man, no wonder he speaks nonsense.
Say what???
Dowd cited the confirmation of Thomas to the high court as evidence that Republicans helped “empower” Clinton’s sexual behavior in the White House.
“We saw this in ‘91, the Republicans gave up their values in order to get Justice Thomas on the court,” Dowd said. “They basically called Anita Hill a nut and a liar in order to get Justice Thomas on the court.”
Fake news
Stalinists lie. Always
Wow. Just wow.
EXCERPT Institutional feminism died when Gloria Steinem, Madeleine Albright and other top feminists vouched for President Clinton as he brazenly lied about never having had a sexual relationship with “that woman” — Monica Lewinsky.
The Clintons and feminists were outraged when Thomas’s supporters painted Anita Hill as “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty.” Yet that was precisely the Clintonian tack when women spoke up about Bill’s misbehaving.
Time and again, Hillary was a party to demonizing women as liars, bimbos, trailer trash or troubled souls when it seemed clear they were truthful about her philandering husband. She often justified this by thinking of the women as instruments of the right-wing conspiracy.
As I reported in ’98, even some veteran Clinton henchmen felt a little nauseated about the debate inside the White House on a slander strategy for Lewinsky: Should they paint her as a friendly fantasist or a malicious stalker?
==================================
BACKSTORY Former Bill Clinton aide George Stephanopoulos, now a anchor for ABC News, wrote in his memoir All Too Human: A Political Education....... Hillary Clinton had to “savage her enemies” during the Lewinsky affair, repeating a pattern from previous scandals involving her husband’s behavior towards women.
In 1991, for example, when a woman named Connie Hamzy emerged to accuse Bill Clinton of having an affair with her, Hillary Clinton said, “We have to destroy her story,” according to Stephanopoulos. George then set about arranging affidavits from people who couldback up Bill Clinton’s story: “We’d survived our first bimbo eruption,” Stephanopoulos recalled.
=================================
SOURCE: Breitbart.com The Washington Post recently recalled the pattern of Hillary Clinton’s defenses of her husband against what she called “bimbo eruptions”: … Hillary Clinton dismissed an accusation made by Gennifer Flowers, the singer who sold her story to a supermarket tabloid after having previously denied an affair.
In an ABC News interview, she called Flowers “some failed cabaret singer who doesn’t even have much of a résumé to fall back on.” She told Esquire magazine in 1992 that if she had the chance to cross-examine Flowers, “I mean, I would crucify her.”
The Post noted: “Six years later, Bill Clinton acknowledged a sexual encounter with Flowers.”
It added that when the Lewinsky scandal emerged, in which Clinton had oral sex with the then-White House intern in the Oval Office, Hillary Clinton refused to credit the story of his accuser, choosing to believe her husband’s lies instead. Hillary reportedly called Lewinsky a “narcissistic loony toon.”
Former Bill Clinton aide George Stephanopoulos, now an anchor for ABC News, wrote in his memoir All Too Human: A Political Education that Hillary Clinton had to “savage her enemies” during the Lewinsky affair, repeating a pattern from previous scandals involving her husband’s behavior towards women. In 1991, for example, when a woman named Connie Hamzy emerged to accuse Bill Clinton of having an affair with her, Hillary Clinton said, “We have to destroy her story,” according to Stephanopoulos. He then set about arranging affidavits from people who could back up Bill Clinton’s story: “We’d survived our first bimbo eruption,”
Stephanopoulos recalled. Later, Stephanopoulos wrote, he wondered whether he had been “complicit” in Bill Clinton’s behavior “because my defense of Clinton against past bimbo eruptions had been predicated on my belief that he wouldn’t create new ones.” The same might be said of Hillary Clinton.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. His new book, See No Evil: 19 Hard Truths the Left Can’t Handle, is available from Regnery through Amazon. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
Hillary Rotten Clinton empowered Bill’s sexual harassment, assault, and conquests.
Hmmm. How about Broderick, one of his rape victims? I think the event happened in the late seventies, right? So Maureeen, how do you square that?
I think WJC was Bo Diddling long before 1991
Clinton had a long history of harassment, improper relationships with subordinates and even rapes.
Thomas had one, and only one, accuser. A quite possibly deranged woman who actually followed him to another job.
Well, she was a nut and a liar.
LOL. Clinton was a horn dog all his life well before the Thomas hearings.
This is who the GOP uses for political consultants.
There. Fixed it.
It is never their fault (the left). Someone else made them do it, caused it to happen, framed them, bullied them, yadda yadda.
They are convinced they are on the right side of every issue, and will warp reality at every chance to fit that delusion.
Women don’t lie about rape or sexual harassment ... unless they are accusing a powerful Democrat.
Also, who the the Republicans appoint that empowered Clinton raping ladies before the Thomas appointment?
Another DemocRat twisting like a leaf in the wind, trying to defend the part of the KKK, Jim Crow and Segregation and sexual predators.
Anita Hill was a phony, fake fraud agent of the DemocRat left who tried and failed to slime a great American.
So Bill Clinton legacy is if you can I can?
The only thing is Clarence Thomas was innocent.
Bill Clinton is guilty.
Clarence Thomas was Borked.
He never did anything to Anita except perhaps indulge in some coarse jesting about a coke can. If even THAT was true, which probably isn’t, but a huge exaggeration of what really happened.
This is the Merriam Webster official definition of the verb “To Bork”:
Definition of Bork
Borked or borked; Borking or borking; Borks or borks
US politics, slang
:to attack or defeat (a nominee or candidate for public office) unfairly through an organized campaign of harsh public criticism or vilification
In 1987, conservative judge Robert Bork endured such virulent criticism … that to this day, a nominee sidelined by activists is said to have been “borked.” —Claire Suddath, Time, 18 May 2009
Thus, with Bush determined to name an anti-abortion conservative, any nominee may end up Borked. —Rowland Evans and Robert Novak, Washington Post, 1 July 1991
Political party:
Independent (2008–present)
Republican (1999–2007)
Democratic (Before 1999)[1]
Very indecisive man, no wonder he speaks nonsense.
Twisted logic from twisted people. Evil. They went after Thomas with everything they had. Then a short time later they defended BC with “feminists” wishing they were Monica. Disgusting double standards and we all know it.