Skip to comments.Flynn Splits from Trump Lawyers
Posted on 11/23/2017 2:49:06 PM PST by Heff
A Split From Trump Indicates That Flynn Is Moving to Cooperate With Mueller
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
There are a myriad of ways to launder Money through real estate. See Google search
One of the more interesting ways may play out in the dustin hoffman as victim scam.
Btw..lawsuits have been known to launder money
Also used in penny stock scams to transfer assets
Comey a friend of Mueller are tied up in the cover up of the illegal wrong doings of the Hillary Clinton.
Probably not writing line 7b of his tax return in a legible manner and from this liberals will say this is proof of Russian collusion.
So Trump laundered money? Why would he do that with the Russians?
The Chief Executive has the power to fire is FBI director for whatever reason. And it's not unlawful for him to use such power.
Alan Dershowitz: Trump did not obstruct justice in firing James Comey http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-trump-did-not-obstruct-justice-in-firing-james-comey/article/2622875
I did not say trump laundered money. There will be plenty of investigations over how much control trump had over properties that had money laundered through them
Felix sater.long time snitch.. is one avenue of investigation
For example..jody kriss lawsuit.
Trumps lawyer was child hood friend of sater
So Trump is not involved. Then how do you bring down Trump if Trump did not launder money or any other illegal wrong doing? There's no there there.
Exactly that is why the wild goose chaser is going after the low hanging fruit of 'leaked' intel from Israel that he has no case for...
Yes..it can be
Mark this post. There is a reason Mueller wants docs..like the original one that mcghan kept in a safe.
The only question is whether mueller would leave it to congress or make the Jaworski SCOTUS argument..if he finds evidence of obstruction.
Then what’s Mueller’s argument to Congress or SCOTUS that Trump obstructed justice? Obstructed what - that he fired Comey for what? That he laundered money or colluded with Pooty Poot to take down Hillary through Wiki leaks?
I did not say trump did or did not. I am not privy to all witnesses or documentation.
Neither are you.
But be honest..use common sense..look at the details of the trump property in..for example..Azerbaijan...whose president is the former father in law of one of the Jr meeting players
You really have to be an idiot not to understand what kind of financial dealings were going on with that property .. the question is one of whether it was just a leasing of his name or did they have control
"here what the deep state blogs have got. (so we can work against the deluge that is coming) cliffs notes style ..."
Oh for the love of God. How can you possibly read that crap and post it here. Are you just trying to keep us informed of enemy activity or gaslighting for effect? That dribble is posted on the left to lift their poor spirits up. To keep them from laying down their arms and surrendering en masse.
What the deep state cabal is trying to do is manage Flynn, keep him from detonating the IC and their entire universe in a big bang. Between him and Binney, plus Assange/Greenwald/Snowden and many others they are in serious trouble, too much toothpaste all over the place to squeeze back into the tube.
There is a reason the (D)ummies and (R)inos did not let Flynn testify live on TV in front of Congress. The last time they had a unmanageable patriot standing there, swearing to tell the whole truth, he mowed them down with a figurative machine gun. They are trying to manage Mike Flynn and make him go away as quietly as they can. From what I have seen of him and his son, I don't think it is remotely possible. And "turning on Trump". ROTFLMFAO!
He will no doubt cut some "deal" but that deal will be to his liking. One that does not prevent him from spilling what he knows about his tenure during the DingleBarry and earlier eras. Flynn likely has information on Mueller as well as the entire IC since DIA interfaces with FBI often, and this surely includes the whole Uranium issue.
Never forget there is no love lost between the uniformed IC and the political civies. We cannot be sure where Mueller fits in the scheme of things, but he is nowhere near as radical as Brennan and Clapper and the civilian hacks. My guess is he is the 'fixer' trying to salvage the deep state IC from being turned inside out, from ripping the Pentagon and Fort Meade away from Langley. In short, doing whatever he can to keep Flynn from 'taking down the government' ( that is their view, they believe they are the permanent government ). So Flynn will cop to some process crimes, but will not go away. His challenge is to avoid signing anything that limits his ability to talk. I don't think the bad guys have a chance any longer. They surrendered on the JFK files, their attacks on the emperor failed, the party is over and now they want to prevent another Church committee from sending them to prison.
The perps did the unthinkable. They spied on a Presidential candidate and President-Elect and his family and associates. All American citizens mostly on US soil. And, they manufactured lies to do it. This unbelievable crime runs right to the very top of the government in a way that exceeds a '24' episode. This simple and inarguable fact is what the enemy wakes up to every morning and goes to sleep with every night. They are extremely worried. And they should be because they do not control the outcome.
The argument for SCOTUS is whether trump can be indicted..thus why I said Jawaroski
I am not interested in making a case
It is easier to say that is my position..come back later and tell me I am wrong
Trump can be guilty of obstruction in the firing of comey..is he..I dont know
Separate sources with links to the intelligence and justice communities have stated that a sealed indictment has been granted
While it is understood that the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution means that, until Mr. Trump is impeached, he cannot be prosecuted, sources say that the indictment is intended by the FBI and prosecutors in the Justice Department to form the basis of Mr. Trumps impeachment.
While it is understood that the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution means that, until Mr. Trump is impeached, he cannot be prosecuted, sources say that the indictment is intended by the FBI and prosecutors in the Justice Department to form the basis of Mr. Trumps impeachment. The indictment is, perhaps uniquely, not intended or expected to be used for prosecution, sources say, because of the constitutional position of the President.
Who was that? And when?
You can’t “work against” imaginary insanity. When you even try, it has already won. If this BS ever surfaces, then we expose its glaring holes and destroy it.
Yes..it can be
The House Judiciary Committee can continue any FBI or Mueller investigations that they want and they can draw up articles of impeachment if they find any wrong doing by the president.
That's the Constitutional way. To take powers away from the Chief Executive, by saying that he can't fire his FBI director, isn't the Constitutional way.
Trump needs to take back the executive branch from the Deep State.
Because hes has got absolute NADA! (expect some low hanging fruit)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.