Posted on 11/28/2017 6:15:38 AM PST by thinden
A government watchdog who played a central role in the Hillary Clinton email investigation during the Obama administration told Fox News that he, his family and his staffers faced an intense backlash at the time from Clinton allies – and that the campaign even put out word that it planned to fire him if the Democratic presidential nominee won the 2016 election.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
This is the way of the Clinton Crime Syndacate. The only way to get to the bottom of the corruption is a RICO investigation, which will never happen.
Clinton and Obama. Obama systematically removed any IG’s that had enough integrity to actually do their job. The first step was to get his own foxes guarding the henhouse.
Apparently Obama missed this guy when he was libeling and illegally firing folks like Gerald Walpin and the other 5? IG’s he got rid of for simply doing their jobs.
I think this goes even beyond RICO. At this point it would take a Nuremburg trial to get to the bottom of the cesspool.
The follow on interview with the dem shill mouthpiece is always entertaining. So far my TV has resisted anything thrown at it as he tries to shuck and jive and wordsmith responses. To the comment about many classified emails, he tried to interject only three were marked classified to which Tucker shut him down by saying there were many classified regardless of markings.
Meanwhile that POS flits about free as a bird which she should be in a super max.
That's a sure way to motivate people!
OMG we dodged a bullet with this harradin running the Givernment it would have been nothing but threats from the top down to buckle under or be fired (or worse)
She's had people killed before... I believe that 100%. I am not saying she personally ever did it, but she made her wishes known, they were carried out, and the people responsible became useful operatives in their crime syndicate.
Google Larry Sinclair- who says he Killed on orders from the Clintons. You would think the police would be interested in a person willing to confess to unsolved murders. But not when it would implicate the Clintons.
“”Google Larry Sinclair- who says he Killed on orders from the Clintons””
I thought he was linked to obozo not the Clintons. You might mean Larry Nichols..he caused them a lot of heartburn in the ‘90’s but I don’t think any of it ever stuck. Not for the public or law enforcement certainly.
“At this point it would take a Nuremburg trial to get to the bottom of the cesspool.”
And a brief stay at the Ceausescu Courtyard Inn to serve up the justice so richly deserved.
great interview on tucker carlson last night. just being reported on Fox News website this morning.
Yeah, Hil and Bill will Assume Room Temperature and Web Hubbel Spawn will be feasting off the carcass of the Foundation before a RICO case would even get out of the chute.
Mike Huckabee had a good comment this morning: “It isn’t drain the swamp, it’s flush the sewer. At least a swamp has some ecological value.”
“Google Larry Sinclair- who says he Killed on orders from the Clintons.”
The same Larry Sinclair who claimed he was Obama’s secret gay lover?
I think you guys are getting Larry Sinclair confused with Larry Nichols?
No - that is not the right guy, Who am I mixing him up with?
There is a guy who has an hour long ‘confession’ video on YouTube who says he killed on orders of the clintons.
I think i got the wrong name
yes - thank you
I dunno, but I would be a little skeptical of anyone who voluntarily confesses on youtube to a crime with no statute of limitations.
Your thinking is backwards. You’re skeptical of someone BECAUSE he confesses?
I would wonder more why he is NOT being investigated - after confessing to crimes with no statute of limitations.
You would think the police would be anxious to talk to him.
He says so right in the video that he knows there is no statute of limitations and says he would cooperate in any investigation.
Why are they not beating a pathway to his door to question him about unsolved murders?
“You’re skeptical of someone BECAUSE he confesses?”
Yes, because actual criminals don’t tend to voluntary confess crimes on youtube that they could be imprisoned for. People who just want attention tend to do things like that.
“Why are they not beating a pathway to his door to question him about unsolved murders?”
Probably because they don’t think his story is credible?
ok, i think i see the problem now
If H had won the election, the IG would be fired and we would not know about this. But there is so much damning information coming out, it's possible that the public will get bored. And the GOP-e would have no problem with that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.