The difference of course, is that Breitbart and Ingraham aren't blog pimps, exploiting Free Republic desperately
...website hits.
Posted on 12/27/2017 5:11:40 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Besides, I have always thought of you as one of our best home-grown journalist types, only unbesmirched by any journalism.
Did produce a few good reports from “on the ground”, it’s true.
Fun times, those.
Strong-voiced too, big boy.
Now that Laura Ingraham is tweeting this same info from Huffpo, I suppose this thread makes sense. But far better to give hits to huffpo than to a conseevative blogger who was on his toes.
Purity is the enemy of the good sometimes
Actually, the first to publish this story was Breitbart... over 10 hours ago -
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3617353/posts
Haw!
Pot, meet kettle.
The difference of course, is that Breitbart and Ingraham aren't blog pimps, exploiting Free Republic desperately
...website hits.
Actually 10 hours ago is the same time this thread was posted.
In reality, the BBC was the first to report it.
Who cares about blogs if they are ACCURATE
I've got nothing against blogs; it's blog pimps I have a problem with - especially those who exploit Free Republic for no other purpose than to get hits on their sites.
But it’s ok for huffpo and wapo to get hits like they are not fake news?
Some Blogs are crap all the time. Some actually cite news based in fact every now and then.
You don’t know it til you read it, but how is that different from wapo and nyt?
Obama wants central government control of the internet either Chinese, North Korean, Iranian, or Cuban style.
Too much freedom out there, according to this totalitarian pig.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.