Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Labor Department Plans Drug Test Regulation For Unemployment Benefits
Breitbart ^ | 1-4-2018 | Sean Moran

Posted on 01/04/2018 6:32:46 AM PST by blam

The Donald Trump administration hopes to unveil a new Labor Department regulation in June requiring drug testing for unemployment benefits. Republicans used the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal an Obama-era regulation that limited states’ ability to limit drug testing for people who apply for unemployment benefits.

After President Trump signed the CRA repealing the Obama-era regulation, House Ways and Means chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) said:

President Trump just signed into law my bill that abolishes an Obama-era rule. After five years of battling with the Obama Department of Labor, states like Texas will now be allowed to drug test folks on unemployment to ensure they are job-ready from day one. This is a win for families, workers, job creators, and local economies.

Chairman Brady proposed the bill with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who sponsored the Senate version of the CRA.

American unemployment claims remain at a 17-year record low, and American consumer sentiment reached its highest level since 2000, according to the University of Michigan.

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benefits; drugtest; unemployed; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
I think drug testing for welfare benefits would be more important. See Wisconsin:

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Pushes Drug Testing For Welfare Recipients

"Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker said he would push legislation that would require working-age adults receiving food stamps or unemployment benefits to submit to drug testing."

Also, every elected official and government employee.

1 posted on 01/04/2018 6:32:47 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

“Weeping and gnashing of teeth”


2 posted on 01/04/2018 6:35:59 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Good call!


3 posted on 01/04/2018 6:37:05 AM PST by Fireone (Lock Her Up! (and 100 of her accomplices))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The money goes to finance their habit instead of food and rent otherwise. Drug testing should be required for ALL taxpayer-funded benefits.


4 posted on 01/04/2018 6:39:19 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Oh the horror of it all. Oh the horror.

Where does the country go after dropping lazy pot smoking good for nothing people off the free ride.


5 posted on 01/04/2018 6:39:27 AM PST by Fhios (1987: Where's Waldo -- 2017: Where's Jeff Sessions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Yes, and check for pot and deny all benefits if on pot. Liberal states will $hit their pants.


6 posted on 01/04/2018 6:41:48 AM PST by I want the USA back (Lying Media: willing and eager allies of hate-America savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Why is it that it’s Upwardly Mobile people who want the poor to be able to be flush with weed? Meanwhile, an 18 year old with an average IQ of 100 using 3 times a week for 20 years, will suffer an 8 point UNRECOVERABLE loss, to go down to 92 IQ, so that, when he started, 50% of people were smarter than him, 71% of people are smarter than him at age 38.


7 posted on 01/04/2018 6:44:54 AM PST by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

I just got polled (this last weekend) on this and numerous other items in Trump’s agenda. about a 20 minute phone survey.


8 posted on 01/04/2018 7:01:38 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The Left doesnÂ’t have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; All

>
...to repeal an Obama-era regulation that limited states’ ability to limit drug testing for people who apply for unemployment benefits.
>

How ‘bout REMOVING the States’ (AND Feds) ability to trample upon our property Rights (5th) and [economic] indentured servitude (13th) instead?!

WHOLE lot more than ‘2 birds’ w/ that ONE stone...


9 posted on 01/04/2018 7:05:20 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

A wonderful idea, long overdue, which will no doubt be blocked by a Liberal judge ten minutes after the ink dries.


10 posted on 01/04/2018 7:12:26 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The Feds would have to pay for it, and I suspect it will cost more money than it saves.


11 posted on 01/04/2018 7:57:13 AM PST by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Sounds good, but testing for welfare is much more important.

Employers pay into a fund for unemployment benefits. And a person has to have worked for a certain length of time to collect if laid off. Quitting or getting fired for cause does not entitle one to unemployment benefits.

Also, the benefits expire, whereas welfare goes on forever.

I think this is a much lower priority than the welfare side of the coin.


12 posted on 01/04/2018 8:26:54 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60's....You weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Unemployment benefits are a good start.


13 posted on 01/04/2018 8:32:33 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Would be interesting to know how many people who are on long term unemployment and have been on multiple times are on unemployment because they can’t pass the whiz quiz.

In my flyover state, you are virtually guaranteed a manufacturing job if you can pass the drug screening.


14 posted on 01/04/2018 8:37:43 AM PST by IamConservative (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
So what if “it will cost more money than it saves!”

The point is that those claiming unemployment benefits, being too stoned or high to take any job, need not be getting benefits - period!

Yes, they’ve presumably paid in to the benefit but their former employers did also, at a cost to everyone and now the unemployed wants to pretend to be looking for another job, while laying around all day, doing drugs!

Does the unemployment office send the person out on job interviews, all the while the employee couldn’t pass the drug test now required by most employers?

Were I in charge, the first time the unemployed was refused work because they either failed the mandatory drug test or refused to take one, that person’s benefits would cease, no more benefits.

15 posted on 01/04/2018 8:41:49 AM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

I would not have any problem passing such a test, But I consider this an extreme invasion of privacy. This is not welfare. This is insurance that was paid for by your Employer. Nothing could be more wrong. But you brave new world types seem to love the idea. What ways do you want to be tested next? No doubt they will extract your DNA while they are at it. You are all like sheep to the slaughter.


16 posted on 01/04/2018 8:50:42 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Drug testing for welfare recipients needs to start immediately.


17 posted on 01/04/2018 9:06:24 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
What’s the problem doing both, plus for food stamps, housing free anything?

As a taxpayer, having my taxes go for food stamps, then the schools “have” to give free food, including now breakfast, lunch AND dinner AND giving the students back packs to take home in Friday’s so “they will have food to eat!”

I’m well aware as to why the teacher’s unions glommed on to the “free lunch scams,” so they can claim so many schools are “high risk” to claim higher and higher $$$$$ tax dollars from Uncle Sugar, now Santa Clause, is exactly why.

Everyone’s on the US Santa Clause gravy train but the US citizen taxpayers!

18 posted on 01/04/2018 9:07:54 AM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

You gotta know that’s RACIST!


19 posted on 01/04/2018 12:14:03 PM PST by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The Florida scotus shot down a similar law for welfare recipients.

I’m so tired of judicial tyranny.


20 posted on 01/04/2018 1:03:31 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson