Posted on 01/10/2018 9:41:52 AM PST by Kaslin
Kids need saturated fat in their diet.
So do adults.
My sis said their district signed up for the lunches and got money for doing so. When they went to unshackle, they simple could not untangle from the molasses. A school I volunteered for pressured each registering and re-registering parent to sign up for free lunches. They got money for the food and instead used it for their own pleasure.
The D of Ed is rife with corruption.
Subway joins Michelle Obama in Let's Move three-year partnership
Subway Might Be Having an Even Worse Year Than Chipotle
(May 2016) The sandwich chain could be in big trouble. Subway Was Forced To Close 877 Restaurants Last Year ...
Garlic milk though? Lol
Lots of good stuff there. But ideally, kids should get 4% whole milk un homogenized, but just shaken before apportioning.
Kid’s brains need that fat which the Creator in His wisdom put there.
I expect to find pictures of trannies here.
Oh wait.....................
How healthy is a healthy lunch that is transported straight from the serving table to the garbage can? Are the cans stronger and less prone to malnutrition?
The school districts were/are under a lot of pressure to increase the number of students receiving free/reduced-price lunches. The school I taught at awarded prizes to students who returned their free-lunch applications. I believe schools get extra funding for higher “poverty” populations—which are measured by the free-lunch count.
I expect to find clarity here. But oh wait.
I’ve got a better idea: Let parents be responsible for feeding their own children.
Don’t know if I’d like “garlick” milk myself.
That's why a lot of school districts that weren't filled with welfare recipients dumped their Federal school lunch programs entirely. If only 20% of their students were getting Federally-subsidized lunches but the other 80% had to eat the same sh!t that was being served in the school cafeteria, then they lost more money when the 80% stopped buying the school lunches than they got in Federal money anyway.
My daughter called whole milk, which we did not use, “onion milk” because of the different taste from the 2% we used at home. She got whole milk at the babysitter’s house.
I still cannot fathom why anyone paid attention to her. She wasn’t elected to a G-D thing. And if the districts were threatened with loss of funding someone should have sued the government in the most conservative leaning Federal court circuit. All that being said, those kids she and the Democrats who forced on to a starvation diet should be reminded endlessly as they reach voting age exactly who was responsible.
That headline writer deserves a $1000 bonus!
Great idea.
Why would a school district sue the government over this? School districts don't give a damn about the Federal regulations, and they don't give a damn whether the kids eat the lunches or not. They just want the money. They would have been perfectly OK if the Obama administration required them to serve dog sh!t in their school lunches.
Federal school lunch regulations have nothing to do with what is best for the kids, anyway. When you see something on a school lunch tray, you can be damn sure that an entire industry has lobbied the Federal government heavily to make sure it was required to be there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.