Posted on 01/29/2018 8:04:50 AM PST by detective
House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte appears on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo to discuss his ongoing investigation into the DOJ and FBI. Chairman Goodlatte holds primary oversight authority over the entire Justice Department.
Part of the conversation turns very interesting, and provides an indicator into the next phase, when Bartiromo mentions messages between FBI Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ Attorney Lisa Page surrounding an intent to “destroy evidence”, during their participation in the Clinton investigation.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
It is clear they colluded with the Clinton campaign and the DNC to obstruct justice and sabotage the investigations. It is also clear that there was a major conspiracy to illegally use intelligence resources to conduct an illegal operation of surveillance on the presidential campaign of candidate Donald Trump.
no arrests, no arrests, no arrests...
Mass arrests?
If there are no arrests by mid to late Spring, you’ll see GOP voters tune out. If the rule of law isn’t going to mean a damn thing in the USA....?
Read this last night and it’s excellent (as is virtually everything Sundance writes). Thanks for posting it here.
The thing that stood out to me in this article is the horizontal spread across the executive branch flow chart.....how widely the effort to surveil and subvert Trump spread across thr Org chart...which makes it completely incomprehensible that Obama did not know and therefore authorize this entire effort.
I knew for quite some time Obama was at the heart of this but for any who doubted....read towards the end if the article, all the names in high positions who had a hand in this. No way Obama was briefed and if he was briefed and didn’t nix it....then he approved it.
The current amazingly improving economy is certainly important.
What is more important is the analysis of circumstances and disposition of highly placed government officials that have demonstrably amd criminally threatened the very foundation of our government.
Tramp had damn well address this more important issue in his SOTU address and in a significant, meaningful way.
It is incredibly disturbing that a cabal of conspirators are STILL working inside the government and continuing their corrupt ways while remaining in their upper level management positions. These people have violated the trust placed in them and have covered up their seditious machinations.
They need to be uprooted and removed, and prevented from manipulating the machinery and resources of OUR government for partisan purposes.
Trump had better get on with the task of removing them for the sake of our democracy.
Once elected, Obama wasted no time corrupting the DOJ. That was Eric Holders full-time job. J. Christian Adams, resigned from the DOJ when the New Black Panther party was let off the hook for intimidating white voters at a polling place in Philadelphia wrote a book titled which covers what has been done to that already politicized organization.
If any of them ever do come up on charges we need to make DAMNED SURE that the trial gets moved away from D.C.
I don’t believe that a jury of DC public trough feeders would ever vote to convict any of these people on ANYTHING.
I find this statement almost amusing, “...FBI and DOJ leaders who are demanding to see it [the HPSCI four-page memo].” After months of stonewalling congressional committees’ requests for information, they “demand” anything of Congress? I’m afraid I’d have to tell Sessions and Wray, “F**k you, nasty letter follows...”
The FBI and DOJ are part of the executive branch. When the House Intelligence Committee votes to release the Nunes Memo, they are in fact giving that memo to the executive branch (President Trump) prior to release.Are they setting up Trump?
President Trump is the head of the executive branch. The DOJ and FBI are within the executive branch. When Nunes releases the House Intel memo to the executive branch, they are giving the memo to the FBI and DOJ in advance of public release.
It is not up to Chairman Nunes to decide to give the memo to specific leadership within the FBI or DOJ; that decision is entirely up to President Trump who is the boss over the FBI and DOJ leaders who are demanding to see it.
Mueller is trying to get jurisdiction over both FBIgate and the Clinton e-mail investigation review. As the individual matters investigations get blurred together, the more likely Mueller will find some grounds to expand his purview to include the whole mess...
Deep State addressed and named!
“...make DAMNED SURE that the trial gets moved away from D.C.”
Ro-ger THAT.
Dodge City, Kansas would be a “go” in my book.
Bump!
Think back to the Watergate scandal (if you’re old enough). Nixon was in real trouble only when fellow Republicans started turning on him.
The same applies with these current Obama and Hillary scandals. It means nothing when an opposition party member criticizes those two. It will only mean something when Democrats start to criticize them.
And that ain’t gonna happen, ever.
Even based on what little I know about the man, I can say with confidence that a lot of people are going to pay dearly for this.
“Tramp had damn well address this more important issue in his SOTU address and in a significant, meaningful way.”
This is an active investigation possibly tying back to the H Clinton computer that was hacked by foreign agents and contained sensitive or higher information. It is not the time or place to comment on what could be a small group of texts and files that are the first of the real evidence in a collusion possibility at this lofty level. A little later down the road when the evidence is presented it can be a matter of conversation. But right now, even though it appears the loop is closing, they still are innocent until proven guilty. And our federal government has a history of finding loophole to get even guilty people off. Don’t need to blow it.
rwood
The FBI should openly revolt against the related appointments and career criminals — for the good of the Country.
A very astute Freeper pointed out recently that these people were all brought on board from positions in large, established D.C. law firms. This means two important things:
1. Putting them in charge of this investigation precludes them from working as attorneys for any of the people who may be facing legal trouble over the any of the Obama-era scandals that are surfacing.
2. They can't claim lawyer-client privilege for any of their prior dealings with these Obama/Clinton cronies without compromising the whole Mueller investigation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.