Posted on 02/09/2018 6:21:24 AM PST by LS
So we find out FBI Peter Strzok text to DOJ Lisa Page on Aug 15, '16 'we need an insurance policy'. Lots of speculation about what. With all that's come out (so far) I'm 100% certain that policy was the Dossier. BOTH of them.
2. So on Sept 29, they text 'can you step out to pick up the *product*?' The product is almost CERTAINLY the Steele dossier. They took delivery of their manufactured evidence to begin their attempted coup. They begin acting on their seditious conspiracy.
3. So in October, per McCabe's congressional testimony, a FISA application based on the Steele Work of Fiction & a Steele planted yahoo story, was used to get a FISA WARRANT for Title 1 spying, which went after the entire Trump team.
4. So @MarkWarner *hid* his communications to ACTIVELY get opposition research fr Steele through the lobbyist of a Russian linked to organized crime, Russian Intelligence, & to V. Putin himself.
5. We *know for a fact* the ONLY reason @MarkWarner chose to tell the committee (he never told America) he did so was bc he found out his actions are being investigated by DOJ IG Horowitz.
6. Horowitz would have no reason to suspect Mark Warner unless something in his FBI/DOJ investigation pointed him to Warner. Do you realize what that means? 7. DOJ IG would have had to find communications to/from FBI & DOJ people about this with Warner. Think about what that means for a second:
8. First, Sen Ron Johnson's Interim Report on the email investigation by @FBI gave us over 500 Strzok/page texts & emails & this doesn't appear. Also they aren't Sr enough to have direct contact s Ranking D member of Sen Intell Committee..
9. Second, who's emails/Texts DONT we have, that congress is demanding, that DOJ IG DOES have? Who did Wray ask to resign HOURS after seeing Nunes Memo before it's declass & release? Who did Strzok & Page coordinate their 'insurance policy' with?
10. Andy. Andy McCabe. The no. 2 at @FBI who WAS Sr enough to directly interface w a Sr Intell committee member & gang of 8 member. The former Asst Dep Dir of CI at the bureau, that McCabe.
11. IG Report is going to be earth shattering. Tick tock. ⏰
My immediate guess as well.
You’re telling me.
That means Warner (code name “Oligarch”) and Shifty were getting the intel and sharing it back with the Deep State coupsters.
I found it disturbing that Nunes had to recuse himself while being investigated for not sharing info with the committee.
Warner, did the same, no reprecussion. Rubio today stated, no biggie, Warner told the committee 4 months ago about this. But he didn’t tell until it was discovered via IG so he was forced to tell.
He doesn’t want them leaking that they have nothing
IIRC, back during Gulf War-1 Rush had a spoof commercial for a movie of the same with actors with physical traits similar to the politicians of the day.
It was a funny bit and would like to see one done for this current mess.
The best comparison I remember was Dick Gephardt payed by E.T.
I hope the IG is keeping a second set of books. Something tells me the moment he announces he’s completed his investigation the FBI is going to pay him a visit and confiscate all materials and pass out the threatening non-disclosure letters.
I would be surprised if the completed report sees the light of day.
No big deal — Except when someone uses bleach-bit to destroy subpoenaed, incriminating emails. At that point, it becomes a very big deal.
No big deal — Except when someone uses bleach-bit to destroy subpoenaed, incriminating emails. At that point, it becomes a very big deal.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Bttt.
5.56mm
McCabe. The no. 2 at @FBI
He was #1 after Comey was fired. Remember that?
I’ll bet on that for a dollar!
You’re absolutely right. Thanks to LS, too. Very significant post.
Exactly!
hmmmm.
Given the Clinton M.O. (after news of Monica came out, it is reported that Bill Clinton said, "Well, we'll just have to win, then"), and Lanny Davis et al. declaring "it's just about sex!" and smearing Ken Starr...you're right.
Perhaps the reason for the directive to abstain from talking to congress without permission?
I’m sure there is an innocent explanation for this . . . just waiting on CNN to tell me what it is.
Thank you! Regardless, McNuts' fingerprints are all over this!
The exchange of emails started in February. Why did the committee only find out about it four months ago and how did that come about? And we the public only found out about it this week. Why?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.