Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Read the LAST paragraph first.

Prince had no formal role with the Trump campaign or transition. However, according to people familiar with the Seychelles meeting, he presented himself as an unofficial envoy for Trump to high-ranking Emiratis involved in setting up his discussion with the Russian official.

1 posted on 03/08/2018 7:03:14 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: ptsal

Moreover Trump was already elected

Mueller and the left are off their nut. Congress needs to shut this crap down


2 posted on 03/08/2018 7:05:29 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

“Da Russkis are everywhere!” - Little Bobby Mueller


3 posted on 03/08/2018 7:07:05 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

????? After the election???? Soooo Whaaaaat! Back channel is nothing new, it goes on all the time. Somethings can’t and should not be said in front of the news Camera.


5 posted on 03/08/2018 7:07:55 AM PST by Bringbackthedraft (Damn Cursor did it again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal
In January 2017, Erik Prince, the founder of the private security company Blackwater, met with a Russian official close to Russian President Vladimir Putin and later described the meeting to congressional investigators as a chance encounter that was not a planned discussion of U.S.-Russia relations.

BFD if it WAS a planned meeting anyway -- the election was over!

6 posted on 03/08/2018 7:07:59 AM PST by ScottinVA ( Liberals, go find another country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

joke of an investigation


7 posted on 03/08/2018 7:08:19 AM PST by KSCITYBOY (The media is corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

So, now Trump is being investigated for conducting foreign policy?


9 posted on 03/08/2018 7:09:30 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

Still not a crime for an incoming administration to have contact with a foreign government.

Mueller has nothing even if the details are true.


10 posted on 03/08/2018 7:10:03 AM PST by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

Just how is it a crime for an incoming administration to have informal or unofficial conversations with representatives of foreign nations?

Conducting foreign policy is now a crime?


11 posted on 03/08/2018 7:11:31 AM PST by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

I was in the Seychelles a few years ago.
Will Mueller be coming after me?


12 posted on 03/08/2018 7:11:38 AM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

It was right before the inauguration, so it was after the election. During that time an incoming Administration is expected to engage with foreign powers. However, Prince was not even park of the Trump campaign or transition team or Administration. So, even if he was talking to someone, so what?


14 posted on 03/08/2018 7:12:15 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

WTF. Trump was President-elect. He could establish any channel he wanted whether openly or back channel. This has no connection with collusion. In fact it begs the question. If Trump had been colluding with the Russians during the campaign, why would he need to establish a back channel? How would he have communicated with them?


15 posted on 03/08/2018 7:12:44 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

It’s known fact now that JFK set up a back channel to the Kremlin during his presidency with RFK serving as the go between. I guess JFK was a Russian stooge too!


16 posted on 03/08/2018 7:12:56 AM PST by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

Beyond that, how is it a crime for an incoming administration to try and set up a back-channel?


17 posted on 03/08/2018 7:13:23 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal
just before the inauguration of Donald Trump means after the election.
18 posted on 03/08/2018 7:13:25 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

25 posted on 03/08/2018 7:17:03 AM PST by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

An investigation of a Jan/2017 meeting...

‘as part of Mueller’s investigation into Russian efforts to interfere with the 2016 election’

Huh??


26 posted on 03/08/2018 7:17:58 AM PST by kanawa (Trump Loves a Great Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

I would have thought that a back channel would have already been established to enable Putin to defeat Hillary and the entire United States Intelligence Community. Not to mention the Personage in the White House at the time.

Or, I suppose that if Putin is so awesome that he can defeat Hillary from the other side of the globe, he would not need a back channel.

And, being so awesome, Putin can do anything in the United States he chooses to do, so why fight. I mean, if you accept the MSM’s view of Putin.


27 posted on 03/08/2018 7:18:53 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

How is this illegal?


28 posted on 03/08/2018 7:21:55 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

Why is this illegal exactly?


29 posted on 03/08/2018 7:23:12 AM PST by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ptsal

There’s a ruskie in my neighborhood and while walking my dog the other day, my dog sniffed his dog’s butt? Does that constitute “collusion”?


30 posted on 03/08/2018 7:25:05 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Strzok and Page - The very definition of SEDITION and TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson