Posted on 03/09/2018 7:29:14 AM PST by Kaslin
Go for it, Hollywood.
You probably didn't watch the Academy Awards -- most people didn't -- but you might have caught a bit of Frances McDormand's acceptance speech for her Best Actress award. At the end of a stirring speech about women in post-Weinstein Hollywood, she said, "I have two words to leave with you tonight, ladies and gentlemen: inclusion rider."
Don't feel bad if you don't know what an inclusion rider is. McDormand didn't either until recently. She told the press backstage that she had only learned about inclusion riders the previous week.
So what are they?
Simply put, an inclusion rider is like any other rider in a contract for a big-name Hollywood star, except instead of demanding that you have an all-beige dressing room or an infinite supply of green M&M's in your trailer, you demand that the cast and/or crew be diverse according to some formula. Usually, that formula is based on the demographic makeup of the larger society.
Tom Hanks, Oprah Winfrey or any other A-lister can simply say: If you want me, you're going to need to hire X many blacks, Asians, women, gays, etc.
And again, I say: Go for it, Hollywood.
I'm against racial or ethnic quotas for anything remotely smacking of a government position or anything that relies on government money. Just as government shouldn't give preference to certain religions, it shouldn't give preference to certain races or sexual orientations, either.
In principle, I think people should be able to hire whomever they want. Of course, that principle runs up against various civil rights laws banning racial discrimination in public accommodations. And given the historical circumstances that gave rise to those laws -- i.e., the Jim Crow South -- I think those laws are warranted, at least when they stay faithful to their original purpose.
But that's not the situation in Hollywood. Big shots already demand all sorts of jobs and perks for their entourages and personal production companies. So if they can get away with insisting that Disney hire more gay actors or Asian makeup artists, they should give it a try, if that's what they really care about.
Let's be honest about what we're talking about though. An inclusion rider is just a "woke" way of demanding the ability to discriminate on the basis of race, gender, ethnicity, etc. The theory and motivation behind it might not be as evil as Jim Crow, but it's still discrimination at work.
And it is remarkably illiberal, at least when it comes to film crews. What you see on the screen is a matter of artistic vision. If you think a role calls for a black actor, then you're not being unfair to Russell Crowe by casting Denzel Washington. But if you tell a lighting director that he can't have the job he's qualified for because he's not gay or a woman, that's a bit different.
Hollywood's various powerful unions will likely be quick to point this out. As Christine Rosen of the Weekly Standard notes, the Costume Designers Guild is 80 percent female. So if we're to take this idea seriously, a lot of qualified women are going to lose jobs to less qualified men. It would work in reverse for the Art Directors Guild, which is 73 percent male.
So why do I want Hollywood to go for it? Because Hollywood rarely practices what it preaches. We get lots of nice award ceremony speeches about the superior values of Hollywood and how evil big business and Republicans are. We get lots of movies indicting capitalism and glorifying organized labor. The upshot of much of this stuff is that it's easy to do the right thing, so when society does the wrong thing, it must be because evil people wish it so.
Well, here's Hollywood's chance to put its money where its biggest mouths are. And not just the amorphous entity called Hollywood, but the individual actors and directors who just love to preen about their enlightened views. Let's see them prove they have the courage of their convictions.
Rosen is probably right that inclusion riders are ultimately an "unworkable quota system" that will eventually prove to be "another piece of empty Hollywood posturing." But let's see Hollywood try (and the media hold it accountable). Maybe we'll all learn something from the effort.
Bingo. In a fight between unions and "the oppressed," unions will win.
Hollywood should accept my dare to just Drop Dead.
I would say that Hollywood is already operating under an inclusion rider-type quota system and have done for years.
These “diversity” inclusion clauses sounds like cha ching to labor law attorneys.
Exactly, you have sex with the producer, you get a role.
"Clause 24 (Inclusion Rider): A minimum of 45% of the Electricians to be Methodists; 25% of the Script Girls to be Oregonians; 50% of the Make-Up Specialists to be Heterosexual..."
Regards,
It should apply to sports teams as well. Oh, wait. That’s different!!
Who is Frances McDormand?
“”””you demand that the cast and/or crew be diverse according to some formula. Usually, that formula is based on the demographic makeup of the larger society. “”””””””””””
Good. So that means they will start hiring Trump supporting, God loving, gun totin’ white straight males, right?
Didn’t think so.
Let’s see the bunch still in Hollywood do that. They’re always talking about helping the downtrodden. Here would be their opportunity.
They’ll hire enough gay/black/female “art directors” to meet the rider’s requirements. It may be an additional few $100k to meet the demands of a $10 million diva. And everyone on set will be able to have an “art director” got get coffee and donuts whenever they demand.
Basically, they’ll replace interns with “art directors” and brag about how “woke” the production is. I’m sure McDormand will be absolutely thrilled and feel good about herself to see dozens of additional minorities on the set (and won’t even notice they are just delivering donuts).
The left is all about appearance, not results. If they want results, they’ll demand more training and mentoring for unqualified minorities - McDormand could even volunteer her time to help train staff to be better qualified. But they’d rather see jobs go to less qualified minorities (at someone else’s expense) than put out an effort for real change.
He would use one per day, then have the lot of them shipped to homes for boys so that the older ones could look well groomed for school, looking for jobs etc.
We don’t need no stinkin’ riders.
Wouldn’t it be great if the two top gotta have stars have an inclusion rider and an exclusion rider?
I can see acceding to Steve McQueen's demands because he was..Steve McQueen, one of the biggest stars of all time. I wouldn't give a rat's ass what Frances McDormand demands. There is no way she is a box office draw. She's won a couple of Oscars, but she is not a name that puts bottoms on seats in theaters.
Let’s apply it to Black Panther.
“I would say that Hollywood is already operating under an inclusion rider-type quota system and have done for years.
Exactly, you have sex with the producer, you get a role. “
That’s not a rider, it’s a ride her!
“Exactly, you have sex with the producer, you get a role.”
It doesn’t sound like Harvey Weinstein was divying up the casting couch time fairly between female and male actors. Shouldn’t gay males be upset about that?
Leftist’s love Quotas. That’s why many of them Adopt Black Children from Africa.
American Kids of Color aren’t on the approved List.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.