'
Cost estimates for bike lanes in Seattle were wildly off.
The $930 million transportation levy approved by voters will fall short of funding several key projects, including constructing miles of bike lanes and greenways.
At least part of the reason for that shortfall has to do with the enormous amount of money the city is spending on bike lanes. Interim Director Goran Sparrman of the Seattle Department of Transportation told the Seattle Times bikelanes expected to cost around $860,000 per mile are costing up to $12 million.
For the amount the city is spending on a single mile of protected bike lanes, many urban areas in the country could be building a six-lane highway, according to a recent report. And that money would go even further in rural areas.
According to the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, an organization funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, the cost of a five-foot, one-mile bike lane costs between $5,000 and $535,000. The average cost is about $130,000. Which means the estimated $860,000 for a mile of bike lane isnt too extraordinary, especially considering the cost of doing business in the Seattle area.
The news that the city would fall short on several transportation-related promises follows Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkans decision to halt the streetcar expansion project because cost estimates increasing yet again.
I was a big bike commuter there but still against all this money being spent on the lanes. But it is what Seattle does. They WANT people to stop driving. The roads are so bad because so much of your transportation dollars are spent on busses, ferries and bike lanes. It explains why the roads are so nice in Kentucky.
I have to admit, though, that thanks to cell phones and texting, It may be necessary to disallow bicycles on public roads, for the safety of the cyclists. Either that or make bike lanes that have physical barriers to protect them from texters.
Motorcycles too. (no, I’m not seriously proposing it, nor do I think it should happen, but I have little doubt some liberals are seriously considering it.).
Putting unthinkable cost of Seattle bike lanes into perspective
The news isn't all bad: "If the mayor is having a metaphorical heart attack over this, the people who are actually most heartbroken are the bike advocates and safe-streets activists who campaigned most enthusiastically for the levy." (We had to diet the street to save it.)
Again, imagine the news coverage if government spending for a "conservative" cause were handled this way. Any conservative-flavored virtue signaling would've been scrutinized long ago.