To: mandaladon
There was a spy in the Trump camp pre- and post-election and still Mueller has nothing to prosecute Trump on, even after what will soon be two years of an insider spy???
3 posted on
05/15/2018 10:29:39 AM PDT by
airborne
(I don't always scream at the TV but when I do it's hockey season!)
To: airborne
This is BS all about Steele.
7 posted on
05/15/2018 10:35:25 AM PDT by
Lumper20
To: airborne
Almost every report I've read about this story has had a misleading headline. A "mole" would be someone actually working inside the Trump campaign, but none of the information in the original reports actually says that. The DOJ -- and the related Washington Post report -- simply refers to FBI/CIA assets who had some involvement in the investigation.
Neither Joseph Mifsud nor Stefan Halper, for example, would be considered a "mole" under any definition of the word.
17 posted on
05/15/2018 10:50:15 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
To: airborne
Either there is nothing there, or revealing the sources would point to a much larger crime.
Or both. I’m leaning on both based on people I know that work in the Swamp (low level) who keep saying that the methods don’t matter, they “know” Trump is a BAD PERSON.
29 posted on
05/15/2018 11:17:04 AM PDT by
redgolum
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson