Posted on 06/08/2018 3:34:44 AM PDT by rellimpank
Why don't you start with Chicago and see how that works!
Shout loud and long enough, though, and we can prevail.
Shouting is the sign of hate and ignorance. You can shout all you want but you will NEVER take away of Constitutional Rights!
“It is not an assault on the Second Amendment to call for an age restriction of 21 for anybody who wants to buy a military-style weapon of mass death, such as an AR-15 rifle
The second you use the term style you have no valid argument!
If you went with actual military weapons then maybe, just maybe people would listen. But you can’t because military weapons except in extremely rare cases are already not allowed to civilians. The AR 15 is just a rifle. It is not a military weapon.
I was paddled (”the Board of Education”) twice in high school in the early 1960’s.
Fell asleep in Algebra in 10th grade - teacher was the basketball coach.
Forgot to get a test paper signed by my Mom in 1964 - teacher was the football line coach.
BTW, anyone acting the least bit disrespectful in little old Mrs. Jones English class was sent done the hall to “see Coach Thornton”.
Just 31?
Folks need to spend more time at the range.
I only have 21 bullets. Some of you are going to have to share.
I remember when liberals had their panties in a wad over the ownership of 5 shot bolt action army surplus rifles. The demand a ban on the import of them and small foreign made handguns. They got it. Did crime cease? No. So they aimed at other gun to ban.
Interesting that a military rifle import was banned but a “Police Rifle” off the same assembly line was A-OK!
There is something about the term “Military” that liberals have hated since the 1960s.
31 bullets? 31 ROUNDS is my EDC for my GLOCK 26.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.