Posted on 06/15/2018 7:54:11 AM PDT by deplorableindc
Senior FBI official Peter Strzok says he didn't arrange a cocktail party with a federal judge who serves on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, despite telling his mistress in a text message that he would.
Strzok suggested a "cocktail party" with U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras in a July 25, 2016, message to FBI attorney Lisa Page. Days later, on July 31, Strzok opened the FBI's probe of possible Trump campaign collusion with Russia.
Strzok told the Justice Department inspector general's office that his messages regarding the judge dealt with no particular case and that the social gathering didn't happen, according to a report released Thursday on the FBI's Hillary Clinton email investigation.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Oh yeah right. Doesn’t pass the giggle test
Where does the judge’s spouse work?
DC is a two-income town.
Why hasn’t this guy been FIRED ? What are they waiting for ? He is caught being a Dem operative conspiring against the President . Trumps new FBI Head needs to be fired . Who recommended this DC insider ?
Don’t forget that in the history of the world, there was a plebiscite, in which Christ and Barabbas were being judged, and the people chose Barabbas.
Augusto Pinochet
DC is such a pillow-talking town.
Perhaps, Ali Watkins needs to dive into the story and ask the hard question, “Is Judge Contreras acting alone?”
Well, in the texts as I recall, he was very chummy and they were both on a first name basis...Strzok called him “Rudi”...
So easy to prove, it’s painful. First and foremost, cellphone records will put them in the same spot. Second, can’t say for sure, but I’m thinking a FISC Judge might require some type of PSD. Maybe not. But, if he had security, then find out who it was and ask them.
OMG!!!
So he colluded but d no d not follow thru on the collision he planned to dare say ensnare or entrap or maybe Lisa seduce said judge....
she probably worked for the Hillary campaign or the DNC.
Impeach the judge
Nothing from Peter Strzok can be trusted.
bump
The fact that he even considered such a thing is proof of guilt since all these FBI/DoJ people have been proven to been habitual liars.
Not quite proof of guilt, but it is certainly enough to get you probable cause, and that’s enough for a warrant.
The judge was more than happy to approve harassing innocent American citizens.
I wonder how he will like it if his entire phone and computer history is pawed over by teams of investigators.
Why aren’t there reporters camped outside Strzok’s house?
Comey/Lynch. Now its Wray/Sessions. Oh I’m sorry. Rosenstien.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
