Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump Rips Into Social Media Censorship
dailycaller.com ^ | 08/18/2018

Posted on 08/18/2018 8:42:11 AM PDT by Helicondelta

President Donald Trump took aim at social media platforms early Saturday morning, criticizing them for suppressing and even attempting to silence conservative voices.

“They are closing down the opinions of many people on the Right …” he complained in a tweet.

Trump’s tweets followed the news that Facebook had been caught outright blocking videos from the conservative organization PragerU

The president continued by claiming that censorship is “a very dangerous thing & absolutely impossible to police,” pointing out the fact that although he has often complained about “Fake News,” he has never moved to silence his critics.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banconservatives; censorship; facebook; fakenews; frontpage; internet; trump; twitter; usblegitimate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 08/18/2018 8:42:11 AM PDT by Helicondelta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

I have been boycotting FB since I detected the bias in the replies. I suggest you consider that too.


2 posted on 08/18/2018 8:50:06 AM PDT by Rapscallion (THE REAL COLLUSION IS BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND RUSSIAN COMMUNISTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

This is all prelude to a false-flag event, probably on September 11th.

After that nobody’s speech except theirs is going to be allowed in the runup to the election.


3 posted on 08/18/2018 8:55:49 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=400><p> zXSEP5Z, xnKL3lW, XywCCJd, hGhstl4.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

As long as democrats heap abuse on those with another point of view I pay them back in my own way....Silence toward them.


4 posted on 08/18/2018 8:57:05 AM PDT by Rapscallion (THE REAL COLLUSION IS BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND RUSSIAN COMMUNISTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

There are people here who believe Facebook is an essential utility, one that must be regulated.

Regulated by whom?

And just what is so essential?


5 posted on 08/18/2018 8:59:59 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
There are people here who believe Facebook is an essential utility...

Maybe...for hackers, burglers, child molesters, murderers, rapists, the "deep state" etc

6 posted on 08/18/2018 9:06:11 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (The Obama is about to hit the fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

About time. The liberals are trying to control Social Media just as they control
MSM TV Networks and Newspapers.


7 posted on 08/18/2018 9:09:02 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

There are people here who believe that it usblegitimate to ban conservatives from social media. If you can believe it.


8 posted on 08/18/2018 9:10:30 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

There are people here who believe that it is legitimate to ban conservatives from social media.


9 posted on 08/18/2018 9:11:28 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservative98; Chode
???usblegitimate???

Man I thought that I had just learned a NEW Word, tried Searching it and everything to no availe.

Then I saw Your correction.🤪

PING

10 posted on 08/18/2018 9:18:49 AM PDT by mabarker1 (congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1
usblegitimate covfefe Do not be alarmed, it all part of the plan! 😉
11 posted on 08/18/2018 9:30:47 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

I’ve always boycotted FaceCrap and believe it’s a platform for self absorbed people that play keep up with the Jones. I could give a rat’s ass if your child took its first dump or you bought a new house or took a vacation. If I wanted to know, I would ask you in a face to face conversation, no by reading yourFaceCrap page.


12 posted on 08/18/2018 9:48:43 AM PDT by GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
There are people here who believe that it is legitimate to ban conservatives from social media.

These people are the Compliant Conservatives who have taken it up the tailpipe for so long they actually enjoy it.

13 posted on 08/18/2018 9:59:30 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
There are people here who believe that it is legitimate to ban conservatives from social media. If you can believe it.

There's the "We'll just make our own internet, wires and everything, from scratch because, uh, free enterprise, or something like that!" idiocy.

They think that if we get banned from Twitter, we'll just make our own Twitter, hundreds of millions of people will flock to it, and that'll be the end of it.

Complacent, short-sighted, and naive.

And then there's the "I don't care if conservatives get banned from Facetweet because I don't use Facetweet. I just go outside and yell at clouds and President Trump needs to stop using Facetweet and start yelling at clouds because I don't use Facetweet and neither should anyone else!"

Clueless old Grandpa Simpsons who have no understanding of the power of modern social media.

14 posted on 08/18/2018 10:11:42 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

I can’t think of a legal way to stop Facebook, Twitter or Youtube to decide for themselves who to keep or ban.

Just because we want them to stop discriminating against conservative thought doesn’t mean they will.

They weasel and twist to say it is hateful, discriminatory, anti-this and that... It’s very hard to fight them and prove they did anything wrong. And when you sign up for their services, you have to agree to their terms and conditions, ambiguous and nebulous as they are.

Right now, only shame can stop them, and if you expect them to be shamed, you’re expectations are higher than mine or anyone I know this side of fantasyland.

The only way is to either create vigorous competitors to these sites or pass legislation making the public utilities or try them as monopolies.

I do not think that last two will work. If either does, it will be challenged in court. There are too many liberal judges, and even a strict Constitutionalist will may trouble with such a law.

We need to stop using these social media sites. We need to use gab.ai and others as our ONLY social media sites. If enough people get on, these sites will grow and get better.

gab.ai = twitter.com

Social Media Alternatives for Conservatives click —> https://ricochet.com/503703/social-media-altenatives-for-conservatives/


15 posted on 08/18/2018 10:18:12 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Please provide the legal and judicial framework to force them, then.

I cannot think of a way. I really want to know how you think Twitter, Facebook and Youtube, given the plethora of Millennial SJW moderators, public and hidden, that are embedded into these companies.

If any thing, I see it getting much, much worse.


16 posted on 08/18/2018 10:21:14 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1


17 posted on 08/18/2018 10:39:42 AM PDT by Chode ( We’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Good post.


18 posted on 08/18/2018 10:41:39 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

No, “regulation” is different than just not allowing them to regulate. The case is very simple: they enjoy an exemption from liability for content published on their platforms that publishers such as newspapers do not. The reason: promotion of free speech. Either they give up that exemption, and get sued every time someone posts libelous content on their platform, or get out of the business of regulating content on any other basis other than that it’s illegal under the First Amendment or not. In other words, they have no basis for removing content that is otherwise protected under the First Amendment.


19 posted on 08/18/2018 10:51:22 AM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Please provide the legal and judicial framework to force them, then.

Well, I'm not a lawyer and I didn't sleep at a Holiday Inn last night but if I was, I'd say let's start looking at the laws that give these sites protection under the definition of being platforms and not publishers, laws like the DMCA.

If I post something illegal on Twitter, CEO Jack Dorsey isn't going to go to prison. He'll argue, correctly, that the DMCA protects him because Twitter, as a platform, is not responsible for what its users post.

Except... When Dorsey starts censoring posts that are otherwise perfectly legal, Twitter becomes a de facto publisher and should be held to the same legal standards that other non-platforms are.

Let's start there. If you want the legal protections offered to platforms, you need to get out of the business of censoring legal speech. If you want to censor speech, then prepare to be treated as a publisher, held responsible for everything posted on your site, and lose the protections offered to platforms under the DMCA and other similar legislation.

20 posted on 08/18/2018 11:03:39 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson