Well, this particular point I have less problem with. It's been a longstanding tradition that Special Prosecuters often go far afield of their original charter.
My issue is with the News Misleadia in general, and Lanny Davis in particular, assuming the mindset of President Trump, which would have to be a particular one to make these payments 'crimes'.
Intriguing essay. What is the commonly agreed to legal standard of proof for divining the mindset of a person in cases like these? Would Trump have a defense against that argument?
I shared this with my fellow Qtards on the Qtard thread.
We were running out of things to larp about over there.
Hope you don't mind.
:)
p.s. Thanks for the ping. Keep 'em coming, Hunter S. Thompson.
Bagster