The New York Times Anonymous Op-ed Pushes Electoral Sabotage

The Federalist ^ | 09/06/2018 | David Harsanyi

[butlerweave]

They have to remove Trump before November ,LOL

[utahagen]

Agreed. This SOUNDS like what you'd get if a couple of NeverTrumper National Review writers sat in a room with NYTimes editors and they pounded pit an essay. I don't believe for a minute it's genuine.

[shelterguy]

“”” but someone who wishes to guide policy in a more traditional Republican direction.””””””””””””

Traditional like caving and doing whatever the democrats want?

[neverevergiveup]

"NYT accuses Russia of meddling in our elections but the paper is conducting its own brand of election interference. The level of hypocrisy is enormous.'

Exactly.

[A_Former_Democrat]

It’s an assault on American’s Voting Rights

They’ve already tried to suppress our Free Sppech, Due Process, Equal Protectiom and Second Amendment Rights

Thes b******* are pure evil

[Drew68]

When do we move to start putting this insurrection down? It’s starting to fester

Jeff Sessions need to submit his resignation effective immediately.

[JayAr36]

The New York Times Anonymous Op-ed Pushes Electoral Sabotage

by writing an OPED and saying it came from a Senior in the administration.

[DarthVader]

This is an act of sedition.

[GOPJ]

"Anonymous" was moved by the high drama of the McCain funeral... Here's what Anonymous doesn't understand:

John McCain ran for President twice. He was rejected by the American people both times. We didn't trust him - we didn't feel he cared about our concerns.

Jeb Bush was groomed to be President for decades. He was rejected by the American people. We thought he was a wuss who would NOT fight for the things we were concerned about.

Hillary ran for office twice - the more we knew her the less we liked her. That's why she's NOT President.

President Trump ran for office once - and we - the people of the United States - elected him to be our President -in accordance with the Constitution and under the laws of the land.

American Newspapers are failing because the American people don't trust them. This is based on our experience in life. The New York Times writes for the benefit of their reporters or editors one desk over and a handful of 'elites' - NOT for the people. We know the difference...

We the people of the United States elected Donald J Trump to be our President ... and if 'Anonymous' thinks she's so much smarter - then she and her cabal should run for office. We the people will either accept or reject them based on our experience. I suspect in an open race Anonymous and her cabal could not be elected dog catchers.

[Karoo]

I too think anonymous is a she, contrary to the nyt saying it is a he

[Fido969]

[wardamneagle]

When do we move to start putting this insurrection down? It’s starting to fester.

Yes indeed. We can start by declassifying the FISA warrant.
Funny how the dims are whining about classified documents
THEY want during confirmation hearings.

[Brown Deer]

NYT accuses Russia of meddling in our elections but the paper is conducting its own brand of election interference.

[Mouton]

Perhaps a person in the loop with that freckless Sally Yates who vanished from public view after refusing to follow a presidential order. A total piece of S..t now working for some law firm in Atlanta.

[Basket_of_Deplorables]

Sedition.

[Retvet]

It also proves The Democratic Party is subverting the will of the people!

[Eleutheria5]

If they’re trying to thwart his agenda, they’re doing a piss poor job of it.

[Retvet]

Add. Add media as Democrat subversive co-conspirator against the people. It appears that at least one media corporation is an enemy of the people. If you post this kind of emotional gibberish without a source then you’re trying to hide the truth and promote violence against the Office of the President.

[LiveFreeOrDie2001]

It LOOKS to me like there’s a lot of Gov’t Officials DON’T want America to be great!

[Mouton]

Trumps biggest mistakes happened in appointments (AG) and the reluctance to clean house from top to bottom with the slugs that prior administrations left around like land mines. IMO, he felt since he was the boss they would follow his (and the voters) direction. If any of these slugs had defied a CEO in a business environment, they would be gone quicker than you can say quick. That does work with appointees but it can take longer to get rid of the careerists. What they used to do with embedded political hacks in days gone by is find an outpost far from DC and ship them out.