Buy more boots with that huge cash settlement.
Posted on 09/21/2018 4:27:15 PM PDT by aimhigh
A federal appeals panel seems poised to reinstate a defamation lawsuit Sarah Palin brought against The New York Times.
A three-judge panel found it unusual that a judge tossed the lawsuit last year after hearing testimony from a single witness.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel heard oral arguments Friday.
(Excerpt) Read more at lfpress.com ...
Buy more boots with that huge cash settlement.
The onetime Republican vice-presidential nominee sued the newspaper over an editorial titled “America’s Lethal Politics.”
The editorial was published in June 2017 after a gunman opened fire on Republican lawmakers in Virginia, wounding U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise.
The Times’ editorial was corrected twice when readers complained that it appeared to blame a political action committee belonging to Palin for “political incitement.”
Please win
Sarah can wear anything she wants and she will look great - a lovely woman.
“A three-judge panel found it unusual that a judge tossed the lawsuit last year after hearing testimony from a single witness.”
Just a guess, but was this judge appointed by the Nairobi Kid?
Them boots ARE made for walkin’!
I hadn’t heard about this one. Excellent!
“Please win”
Yes. From your keyboard to God’s smart phone!
Just when I was starting to fear that there is no God.
I stood about 20 feet from that spot. then I got attacked by seagulls. She’s got attack seagulls guarding her property. lol. No, seriously, though, on the pier next to her property are some damn vicious seagulls.
FR and CTH luv's you and the Fam.
I said eon's ago it will end up being The Wasilla Times when this is done!
Good. Win big, Sarah.
Another fake news story as the Times editors requested. The settlement will pay for another Palin house in San Clemente.
And for kickin’ liberal ass!
Sarah is living proof that we have all of the beautiful women!
“A three-judge panel found it unusual that a judge tossed the lawsuit last year after hearing testimony from a single witness.”
Probably a dimoKKKRAT judge.
The NY Slimes ..... glad Sarah gets another crack at ‘em.
Go Sarah!
>>>A three-judge panel found it unusual that a judge tossed the lawsuit last year after hearing testimony from a single witness<<
Is “unusual” some sort of Legal Term? I think it’s a synonym for “biased”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.