Posted on 09/26/2018 12:14:53 PM PDT by DCBryan1
“Do you have ten fingers?”
“Are you female”
“Is the Sun bright?”
● It is certain.
● It is decidedly so
● Without a doubt.
● Yes - definitely.
● You may rely on it.
● As I see it, yes.
● Most likely.
● Outlook good.
● Yes.
● Signs point to yes.
● Reply hazy, try again
● Ask again later.
● Better not tell you now.
● Cannot predict now.
● Concentrate and ask again.
● Don't count on it.
● My reply is no.
● My sources say no.
● Outlook not so good.
● Very doubtful.
Ah, HuffPo. Written for people who have a IQ less than or equal to a roadkill squirrel.
Two questions:
How many times was she asked those questions?
Does that even constitute a legal polygraph test.
She should have also been asked her name, and perhaps a couple of more questions to develop a response normal level.
Not really. They were undoubtedly hoping to use that in place of testimony.
1. Is any part of your statement false?
2. Did you make up any part of your statement?
She answered “no” to both with no deception noted. Nothing like I expected. I thought I’d see a question for each statement or allegation made.
Would her medical records show treatment for VD?
In short, the polygraph is as useless as snot-encrusted Kleenex.
That would have been too risky.
And she probably didn't even speak the "no" responses, but used sign language :-)
It he had asked her, all of that should have been included in the test report.
There's no such thing as a "legal polygraph test." They are not admitted in any court of law.
What examiner administered the test and why are there so many scratch outs in the written statement? - totally BS
Fixed it.
-PJ
has released a copy of a polygraph examination report regarding her sexual assault allegation against Brett Kavanaugh
Funny how easy it is to write accurately, yet they never do and prefer to write lies. Clearly illustrating that they are not journalists, they are activists who lie.
this is supposed to be a job interview, not a criminal trial. so why the polygraph test?
Exactly! In the letter to DiFi she claimed that she was going to be vacationing somewhere in the Atlantic region in mid-August. Who decides to get a polygraph in the middle of their vacation?
And yes, how did she, with her fear of flying, get to the East Coast? Sure hope the Rs have copies of her travel records ready to go tomorrow...although I still don’t know if she will actually be there. Is it possible that this whole new accusation is simply another last ditch attempt to stop the hearing tomorrow?
“This behavior would not ever be allowed in a court of law with this type of allegation. And of course the polygraph test if that’s what it was would not be admissible.”
If the cops were called at the time this alleged ‘event’ took place, they wouldn’t have even responded or taken a statement. ‘You’re drinking underage and you got felt up at a party while you were drunk? ‘
Talk to your parents and stop wasting our time, missy.
Ford write to Feinstein that she would be back home in CA on 8-7-18. Hmm...
If she has all the phobias she has claimed she would be on benzos. Polygraph wouldn’t work if she is sedated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.