New Details Raise Serious Doubts Over The Credibility Of The Ford Polygraph

The most notable aspect of the story however is the only two "relevant" questions asked by Hanafin "Is any part of your statement false?" and "Did you make up any part of your statement?"

"Is any part of your statement false?" Response: "No". Explanation: Each part of her statement contains an element of truth along with the falsehoods, so no part is completely false.

"Did you make up any part of your statement?" Response: "No". Explanation: A PR expert made up all the invented parts of her statement for her, so she wouldn't have to.

That's enough for her to pass the polygraph if her far-left PR coaches convince her that what she is saying is legalistically true, just like (alleged) rapist Bill Clinton's "it depends on what the meaning of 'is' is".

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.