Women must be believed, unless the person accused is a democRat. Then absolute proof is required.
Didnt some lib columnist state that a lack of details actually meant MORE credibility?
Even then, it will be passed off as unimportant.. "it's only sex".
Given the chaotic experiences of juvenile coupling, none of us would dare run for office on the off chance that someone, somewhere would "remember" an "unwanted advance".
I remember taking a very nice young women out on a date towards the end of high school and as we left her parent's driveway, the passenger side seat on the old station wagon collapsed back to the prone position and she - now flat on her back - said "this isn't going to be THAT kind of date, is it?" and we both laughed.
Today that sort of episode, viewed through the lens of aggrieved womanhood. would likely bar me from any (Republican) public life.