Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Absentee Ballot RETURNS (2018 v 2016) for IA-1 (Blum-R)
Iowa SOS ^ | 10/30/18 | me

Posted on 10/30/2018 7:10:08 PM PDT by Ravi

See Comments if interested...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: blum; clickbait; iowa; loebsack; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
IA-1 (Blum-R) Leans Dem per RCP:


10/30/2018: D-41,813 (46.0%); R-28,849 (31.8%); I-19,619 (21.6%)

11/01/2016: D-52,511 (45.4%); R-35,119 (30.4%); I-27,614 (23.8%)

These are equivalent points in the election cycles of both years. Compared to 2016, D up 0.6%, R up 1.4% and I down 2.2%. Blum won relatively comfortably in 2016 by 7.6%. Unless I'm missing something, he's doing better than 2016. This is a seat the Dems absolutely need to flip the house I believe. Again these are BALLOT RETURNS.


1 posted on 10/30/2018 7:10:08 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LS

FYI.


2 posted on 10/30/2018 7:10:28 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

It is not clear how those numbers are to be interpreted, they look like the Demons have a substantial lead.


3 posted on 10/30/2018 7:13:52 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

If you are right, you could make 5 times your money with a bet. Its 20-80 against him.

I’m too chicken.

https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/4807/Will-Rod-Blum-be-re-elected-to-the-House-from-IA’s-1st-district


4 posted on 10/30/2018 7:17:48 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas (Localization, not Globalization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Put another away, compared to this exact same time in 2016, D votes are down 10.5k ballots, Rs are down 6.3k ballots (net 4.2k vs 2016 at this point) and R won 2016 by 7% in 2016. Note, in Iowa, Dems tend to win the early vote and Rs on election day.


5 posted on 10/30/2018 7:19:21 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Hmm worth looking at for sure.


6 posted on 10/30/2018 7:20:01 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

Those numbers make sense.


7 posted on 10/30/2018 7:21:10 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Not really. They always lead early voting in Iowa usually by even larger margins.


8 posted on 10/30/2018 7:29:24 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Yeah same here


9 posted on 10/30/2018 7:29:47 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

We know that he won by 7 points in 2016 with EV numbers worse than the ones he has this year. That is fairly compelling.


10 posted on 10/30/2018 7:35:07 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

I believe Blum is plagued by a mini-fraud/scandal. He did not, I guess, list a company he had formed during the campaign year on required documents. Company had to do with removing/erasing/washing/bleachbit negative violation information from ones company website.

I would think it would spell defeat, unless a democrapper. Maybe he will weather the storm?


11 posted on 10/30/2018 7:42:14 PM PDT by whistleduck ("....the calm confidence of a Christian with 4 aces".....S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

There may have been some redistributing, not sure but thought I had heard that


12 posted on 10/30/2018 7:42:29 PM PDT by shoedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

There may have been some redistributing, not sure but thought I had heard that


13 posted on 10/30/2018 7:42:31 PM PDT by shoedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rb22982

Typical Midwestern voting profile. I will vote on election day because they might lose/alter/mutilate my absentee ballot.


14 posted on 10/30/2018 7:43:17 PM PDT by MHT (,`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Thanks Ravi. Looks really good.


15 posted on 10/30/2018 9:07:07 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Ds ALWAYS vote absentee heavily in IA, unlike Rs who vote heavy in OH and FL.

These are terrific numbers. For Rs to be UP comparatively in a district Ds need? Great news.


16 posted on 10/30/2018 9:09:55 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LS; SpeedyInTexas

I know you were asking about Montana. I have their county ballot returns in a spreadsheet format. The only way to look at this is compare Red County Returns (Yellowstone, Flathead, Lewis&Clark, Cascade, Ravalli) with Blue County Returns (Missoula, Gallatin, Silver Bow, Glacier).

I used 2016 election data to determine red and blue counties.

No deep dive here but at a superficial surface glance it does appear that the “Red” counties are turning in their ballots at a faster pace than the “Blue” counties. Particularly Gallatin, Glacier and to a lesser extent Missoula are underperforming relative to their “red” counterparts in terms of turning in their ballots.

I linked the state website and you can open the spreadsheet and look for yourself (last updated last night 10/29). Click absentee counts by county.

https://sosmt.gov/elections/results/


17 posted on 10/30/2018 9:21:53 PM PDT by Ravi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

hey does anyone know what this means when a betting site posts this when I try to bet on a certain political race—

“The Bet to win exceeds the maximum allowed for the bet type in event 2018 US House of Representatives Election - Majority Outcome.


18 posted on 10/30/2018 9:26:27 PM PDT by terart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravi

Thanks. Good work.


19 posted on 10/30/2018 10:09:09 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

No you have to look at what happened in the whole last election. At this point in 2016 the dems has 11000 more ballots in and still list on Election Day

It implies that the dems feel down. Looks to be a seat are hold


20 posted on 10/30/2018 11:55:43 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson