Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

That is because the results didn’t work out in the democrats favor.

it was intentional.


2 posted on 11/15/2018 5:57:25 PM PST by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cableguymn

I would love to see video of these jokers sitting in the parking lot for about half an hour until the deadline was reached, then slowly getting out of their car and making their way to the desk where they can say, “We missed it?!?! Damn!!”


3 posted on 11/15/2018 5:59:29 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cableguymn

THAT is what others also say.

Too bad the US doesn’t have a Free Press willing to investigate and publish.


9 posted on 11/15/2018 6:16:01 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cableguymn

[That is because the results didn’t work out in the democrats favor.

it was intentional.]

I would say you’re probably correct. The Democrats don’t want to be embarrassed with proof of an under-count on the Republican side.

It would make the look like cheaters....(cough)

So, they went for the 2-minute delay to claim - “Hey, we TRIED!”.

They didn’t do 30-seconds nor 1 minute late because they didn’t want it to possibly get in. Yeah, I’m adjusting my tinfoil because Democrats cheat SO OFTEN.

Nah, go for 2 minutes late....be CERTAIN it will be late.

“Hey, we TRIED!”


13 posted on 11/15/2018 6:22:54 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cableguymn

cableguymn wrote:
<<
That is because the results didn’t work out in the democrats favor.

it was intentional
>>

*************************************************************

So, wait... Shouldn’t Snipes brought up on felony charges for disenfranchising those voters who were NOT counted in the machine recount due to her (deliberately) filing the results two minutes too late???

Not that I’m holding my breath for that ever happening, but seriously now... Why is the GOP not making this very case regarding the Florida Dems’ intentional voter disenfranchisement here??? I thought the whole objective was to COUNT EVERY VOTE!


21 posted on 11/15/2018 7:40:30 PM PST by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cableguymn

Well to be precise, its because the democrats under estimated republican turnout, and failed to print enough extra ballots.

I think its standard pracise now among democrat run precincts to cast a significant number of ‘votes’ for democrats they don’t expect to show up to the polls.

Sometimes they get too greedy and cast more votes than there are voters, as seems to happen in some democrat run counties every presidential election.

Other times they just screw up with far too many republican unexpectedly voting.

Our election system in many states and counties is made to facilitate fraud. There is literately next to no data being kept to identify illegal activity. Cheating the system is as easy as walking around the unlocked gate.


23 posted on 11/15/2018 7:48:52 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cableguymn

Broward finished the recount before 3PM Thurs and were celebrating and not up loading the totals to the state. They uploaded at 3:02PM 2min late when they did so the new totals did not count.Why celebrate and not upload could it be because Repub gained votes?

Broward finished their recount long before the Thurs 3PM deadline yet Snipes did not do an upload until 2min past the deadline. We all know this was because Repubs gained votes. Can this be challenged in court?

Same with Palm Beach what was the total when they missed the deadline? I will bet Repub were gaining votes If Dems had been gaining votes they would have meet the 3Pm or Nelson’s lawyer would be in court


28 posted on 11/15/2018 11:32:52 PM PST by klsparrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson