Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tucker39

No, the Proweler was not a Wild Weasel. It did carry a HARM missile, but its mission was not killing SAMs. Personally, I hated the damn planes. Their transmitters were few in number and frequently did not work. It was all too common to have a Prowler fly a mission with only 2-3 operating jammers. They were grossly inferior to the EF-111, except the USAF tossed EW into the trash and put all their eggs in the stealth basket!


16 posted on 11/16/2018 8:27:53 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

I knew nothing of the reliability, but they looked awesome with that gold canopy...


18 posted on 11/16/2018 8:31:50 PM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

True, but then the USAF would still call on jammer assets to accompany stealth strike packages. I suppose that would just be an extra layer of insurance for the F-117’s going down-town. After the retirement of the ‘Spark-Vark’ the Prowler was the only game in town. They became a joint operational asset to be used by the USAF/Navy/Marines.


36 posted on 11/17/2018 8:14:10 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson