Posted on 11/26/2018 5:13:23 PM PST by Kaslin
Women’s activists are frustrated after last week’s ruling by a federal judge in Michigan, which declared that a 22-year-old federal ban on female genital mutilation (FGM) is unconstitutional.
The decision came in response to a case in which Dr. Jumana Nagarwala, along with seven other people, was charged with mutilating the genitals of nine girls from Michigan, Minnesota, and Illinois between the years of 2015 and 2017. Authorities alleged that the girls were roughly 7 years old at the time of the procedure.
According to prosecutors, Nagarwala ultimately headed up a conspiracy for over 12 years, which resulted in the procedure being performed on roughly 100 young girls.
Nagarwala claims she committed no crime, but instead was merely participating in a traditional Muslim religious custom common to the India-based Muslim sect of Dawoodi Bohra.
It is reportedly the first criminal case of its kind, nationwide.
Last Tuesday, US District Judge Bernard Friedman dismissed conspiracy and mutilation charges against each of the eight defendants, ruling that the 1996 federal law banning female genital mutilation was unconstitutional because Congress has no power to enforce such a law. Because the controversial procedure is not technically a commercial activity, reasoned the judge, it does not fall under the Commerce Clause.
A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office said, however, that officials are reviewing the judge’s decision, and may consider an appeal.
Meanwhile, women’s rights advocates are speaking out against the ruling, claiming that it’s an affront to the rights of American women.
“It’s a giant step backward in the protection of women’s and girls’ rights,” Shelby Quast, director of Equality Now, told the Detroit Free Press. “Especially when there is a global movement to eliminate this practice.”
The judge did make clear that individual states do have the authority to ban female genital mutilation. The practice is presently illegal in 27 states, but women’s rights activists like Quast worry that the remaining 23 states will become destination locations for FGM, as a result.
“Parents are aware of where there are laws against it and where there are not. And they will take advantage of that,” Quast said.
Michigan state Senator Rick Jones also voiced concern about last week’s ruling.
“I’m angry that the federal judge dismissed this horrific case that affected upwards of a hundred girls who were brutally victimized and attacked against their will,” Jones said in a statement. “This is why it was so important for Michigan to act. We set a precedent that female genital mutilation will not be tolerated here … I hope other states will follow suit.”
The Michigan case led state legislators to officially pass a state law banning female genital mutilation. Anyone performing or assisting in the procedure can face up to 15 years in prison. Nagarwala and the other seven individuals involved were prosecuted under the old federal law, however.
Defense attorney Shannon Smith, who represented Nagarwala, told the Free Press that she is “unbelievably happy” about last week’s ruling.
“The impact is huge,” Smith said. “It eliminates four defendants from the indictment, and it severely punctures major holes in the government’s case.”
Seems like cruel and unusual punishment for simply being a woman.
I probably incorrectly interpreted what the judge wrote. I thought his point was that such a law should be at the State level, not federal. Said there is no constitutional power for the federal government to do this.
Seems like the same logic was used, to a point, as was used to legalize abortion.
So does that mean all laws passed by Congress are unconstitutional?
That has to be the greatest overreach ever by a judge, in my opinion.
Bernard A. Friedman (born September 23, 1943)
Education: Detroit College of Law (J.D.)
#tag idiots will not touch this, its muslim
We’re going to find out soon which protected class is at the top of the PC food chain.
Maybe Occasional-Cortex can introduce a bill banning FGM when the new Congress is sworn in.
Once she gets inaugurated she can pass bills all by herself.
Liberal White Women, who through their pushing for the 19th Amendment foisted most of this crap upon us, are going to be the *most* surprised when they are forced under the bus by their imported “diverse” pets.
I thought civil rights were a federal issue that federal courts had no problem enforcing?
ruling that the 1996 federal law banning female genital mutilation was unconstitutional because Congress has no power to enforce such a law.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This judge says Congress has no authority to do that.
Congress has no authority to do a lot of what they do, what’s interesting is what judges pick to strike down.
Concerned?
I haven’t heard a peep out of any of the usual suspects.
Different judges. That’s sort of the point.
Female Genital Mutilation seems like a cruel and unusual punishment for simply being a woman.
Islamophobes.
Punish those complaining women for their hate crimes.
SPJNK.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.