I’m confused. If they weren’t going to present the evidence to the committee, then why did they come forward to testify at all?
So it looks as though our hope that Huber would be closely scrutinizing the Clinton Foundation is withering on the vine.
*************************************
Withering on the vine? HELL, IT NEVER SPROUTED. It was never intended to “sprout” or go anywhere.
Don’t believe everything you read on the innerwebs, especially from a teapartyblog. The last place highly sensitive information should be disclosed is to congress, which has proven to be nothing more than a bunch of leaking, grandstanding blowhards who despite all their promises and fancy words, are like Charlie Brown with the football when it comes to actually doing anything. And who never missed an opportunity to bloviate to a TV camera or microphone.
An Obamabot would not lose Trump evidence 3times.
They either are traitors or the scandal is so great they do not dare put it to light.
A sternly worded letter to follow, with a sternlier worded letter after that.
Meadows was off base with his remarks. The committee invited Doyle and Moynihan to testify; they did not ask to testify. Doyle, Moynihan are in the business of exposing IRS charity fraud. They invest lots of their own time and money in the hope that the government will go after these frauds because they would be entitled to 10-30% of the taxes recovered for the government. In the Clinton Foundation fraud, they would be entitled to well over $100 million and have earned every penny.
They need to keep the documents and evidence out of the public domain where some other group might weasel their way into their claim.
If Meadows doesn’t understand that, he’s just ignorant about how those things work. and Meadows admitted he didn’t understand it; so why should he be pissed off at Doyle and Moynihan?
“The witnesses also told the committee today they had to send their evidence to the Huber investigation THREE TIMES because they kept losing it.”
On purpose. The Clinton foundation has been exposed by many people for the complete fraud that it is(See Charles Ortel)—a 100 billion dollar international ‘charity’ fraud. We don’t need congressional hearings, we need grand juries
Face it laws don’t apply to elitist Democratic crime syndicate.
Unfortunately Huber has had all the earmarks of Deep State:
+ an Obama nominee,
+ from wacky Utah and part of the Mormon political movement—hello, Mitt!, and
+ all-too-easily voted through the Senate on a voice vote.
Since the Deep State in the DOJ and FBI would want to adulterate or lose the files, the files may have been compromised on the first two times they were submitted. It’s a chain of custody problem in the federal law enforcement. If the good guys thought that could have happened, they would ask for it again to be sure.
Having to ask 3 times is a sign of the battle going on inside the DOJ and the FBI.
Not sure that you should be turning over information in a criminal case to the Legislature. Ever.
and so what. What can congress do about it.
NOTHING resembling facing justice is going to happen to the Clintons.. ever.
Post it on the internet on multiple platforms.
Huber is Deep State. Why on earth would we expect him to do his duty?
Lives threatened?
He’s an obama appointee. Anyone thinks, or thought, he was going to do anything is living in LaLa Land.